Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Ducky,
It is FAR more sensitive. But remember - sensitivity per se is not the most important attribute of a good short wave radio, at least nowadays, when virtually all short wave radios have sufficient sensitivity. A sensitive receiver will pick up local electrical noise even better than an insensitive one! A radio/antenna combination which will minimize that problem is better than one that won't. Take my advice about buying the AOR WL500 Window Loop Antenna (on a returnable basis) first and try it with your Sony ICF-SW7600GR. If you see an improvement in reception quality, then the Grundig Satellit 800 will certainly outperform (on an absolute basis) the Sony, due to its far superior image rejection, IF filtering, AGC action, etc. In order to improve your reception quality, first you must increase the signal-to-noise ratio. Only an antenna can do that. If you find one that will work well in your location (and I believe the WL500 is one that will), then you can upgrade your shack to a better receiver with the knowledge that you are getting your money's worth. If, after following my advice, you ultimately do buy a Satellit 800, well then you can aspire to someday owning a Wellbrook ALA 330S Active Loop Antenna, the finest antenna being made today. But that will be far into the future. You should find that the Grundig Satellit 800/AOR WL500 combination will afford you excellent reception and many hours of pleasant listening. Best, Joe |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Sony 7600GR $130 Shipped From J&R | Swap | |||
7600GR arrived today | Shortwave | |||
Sony 7600gr & Comparison with...... | Shortwave | |||
Sony 7600GR antenna, does not turn smoothly | Shortwave | |||
A couple of Sony 7600GR questions | Shortwave |