Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bpnjensen wrote:
So you murder carrots and potatoes, grains, etc? To suggest that plants are somehow "less" than animals is species-ist (racism applied to other forms of life). Ever swatted a mosquito, taken an antibiotic or washed your hands? I wonder how many life forms die everyday from these activities? Once again, accosted by an apologist for the murder industries who uses false logic and ridiculous analogies to uphold both the murderers and his own chosen lifestyle. It is this simple, Arnie: I do not need meat to thrive. The killing of anything I do not need to survive is unjustified. Therefore, the killing of animals and eating them is unjustified, unless it is in self-defense or a life-or-death emergency. Where the eating of foods is necessary to survive (and to survive I do need to eat something), then it is justified. This why it is OK for seals to eat fish. Maybe the people who choose to live on rocks and bushes made a damn poor choice. In any case, it is not OK to kill a huge proportion of the seal population to sell off furs and increase the fisheries, which off the east coast have been grossly depleted by rampant fishing. If they need to kill some seals to get through a particularly harsh winter, fine - but you won't convince me that wholesale slaughter is justified at all. Beyond this, it is impossible to have a logical discussion about almost anything controversial on this medium with a person who argues using illogism, so I won't even try. Suffice it to say that I choose to take the least harmful and least cruel way. You may choose to take a more cruel way; that is still perfectly legal, if morally bankrupt. If you post supporting cruelty, I will point out where I think you're a barbarian. I don't especially care if you like it or not, agree with it or not. The last word is yours. Bruce Jensen I respect your response, but it is still ethnocentric. Will you take people into your country as immigrants so they don't have to live this way. You personally do not have to eat meat to survive, but that does not allow you or any one else to look down their noses in a "holier than thou" manner on others. What is a "life or death" emergency? Is it okay for someone to hunt so they can provide minimal sustenance to their family? or should the children have no opportunity beyond their parents. Nfld has exported more people than most other jurisdictions b/c their parents did what they had to do to survive and provide opportunity to their kids. And yes this included importing moose from the mainland (where they didn't previously live) as a food source for the people. You cannot grow a garden in Nfld. It's rocks and trees and no vegetables grow in the harsh climate. So everything is either imported or local. And all there is is canned stuff in the stores, or very expensive fresh things, and fish and game. So they hunt some seals so they can buy some canned fruit, notebooks for the kids, coats and shoes. Gas for the boat. I really think you have no idea. Would you move the Inuit out of the arctic also? (Inuit = what you may call Eskimo). I don't think the last word is mine. You suggest "illogism". I suggest not judging others by your external standards of morality. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GRAYLAND 2004 FALL DXPEDITION: Compiled Logs for Oct 15-17 (Part 1) | Shortwave | |||
Heard WOAI San Antonio 1384 Miles Sangean DT-200V | Shortwave | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
[SHARC-News] Hot off the Press! August Issue of SHARC Mariner! | General | |||
[SHARC-News] Hot off the Press! August Issue of SHARC Mariner! | General |