LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17   Report Post  
Old April 19th 05, 05:43 AM
Telamon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

David wrote:

On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 02:43:05 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

http://www.switchcraft.com/products/vpp.html &
http://www.switchcraft.com/products/561.html are examples of video patch
bays and plugs that work for HF receivers as well. They are used for
manual routing of video in some studios and transmitter sites. Western
Electric used to use them on their coaxial long lines that fed video
cross country before TV satellites were available. If you're old enough
to remember the nationwide live video feed after President Kennedy was
assassinated, the techs and engineers at ATT patched together the first
nationwide feed by connecting the different network's feeds together to
provide all network stations with live video and did the same with the
audio feeds.

75 Ohms, if that matters.

If you're going to use RG-59/U, you might as well just use
ubiquitous and cheap F-Connectors and A/B/C switches.



If you want to use 75 ohm cables its your choice. The patch bays are
BNC on both halves so you can use 50 or 75 ohm cables with them. These
patch bays show up used and surplus along with the plugs. I've used
them at several TV stations, a mobile production van I built and in the
telemetry package we shipped to Italy. They are a lot better quality
than "F" fittings and CATV switches. I used to run insertion loss and
other tests on samples for United Video Cablevision and there was more
junk submitted than quality parts. Even the better quality switches
only lasted a year or so when we used them to reroute video feeds in the
L.O. studio.


I think F connectors are just plain nasty. Pain in the butt getting them
started threading. BNC is used on practically any lab equipment in the
audio and video range. Most gear operating 1KHz to 500MHz uses BNC.

Making up the BNC connector is a little more work than a PL-259 but the
push on and twist makes changing patch board connections a snap.

Just say no to F connectors unless you are using RG-59, which they are
made for and the connections will not be changed often.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Antenna splitter? bolt thrower Scanner 6 December 28th 04 11:41 PM
CATV splitter question Jerry Antenna 11 November 15th 04 12:44 AM
CATV splitter question Jerry Antenna 3 November 5th 04 12:31 PM
Scanner antenna splitter Jason Wagner Scanner 7 January 3rd 04 12:08 AM
2-way splitter mfc Antenna 10 November 21st 03 05:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017