Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 13th 05, 07:33 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jamming on BBC World Service 12095kHz?

Is anyone else hearing a loud steady mid-tone permanently on the BBC
World Service on 12095kHz? I've been getting it every time I've tried
to tune in the early evenings UK time over the last couple of months.

If so, is this jamming and is this a known operation, if so who?

I'm in Gloucestershire UK.

--
Andrew Oakley

  #4   Report Post  
Old May 15th 05, 05:16 AM
Bushido Hacks
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Radio blackout on the shortwave frequencies here in North America.
Blame satilite radio services (XM and Sirius) combine that with the
adgenda of the WTO.

  #5   Report Post  
Old May 15th 05, 01:19 PM
M. J. Powell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message . com,
Bushido Hacks writes
Radio blackout on the shortwave frequencies here in North America.
Blame satilite radio services (XM and Sirius) combine that with the
adgenda of the WTO.


Active Sun.

Mike
--
M.J.Powell


  #6   Report Post  
Old May 15th 05, 02:48 PM
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 14 May 2005 21:16:45 -0700, "Bushido Hacks"
wrote:

Radio blackout on the shortwave frequencies here in North America.
Blame satilite radio services (XM and Sirius) combine that with the
adgenda of the WTO.

You gotta be a masochist to put up with the static and distortion
while program listening. Why put precious tax dollars into klunky
tube transmitters when more elegant delivery methods are available?

  #7   Report Post  
Old May 15th 05, 04:46 PM
M. J. Powell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , David
writes
On 14 May 2005 21:16:45 -0700, "Bushido Hacks"
wrote:

Radio blackout on the shortwave frequencies here in North America.
Blame satilite radio services (XM and Sirius) combine that with the
adgenda of the WTO.

You gotta be a masochist to put up with the static and distortion
while program listening. Why put precious tax dollars into klunky
tube transmitters when more elegant delivery methods are available?


Because it's more fun. It gives you a sense of accomplishment.

Mike
  #8   Report Post  
Old May 15th 05, 08:41 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"M. J. Powell" wrote:

In message , David
writes
On 14 May 2005 21:16:45 -0700, "Bushido Hacks"
wrote:

Radio blackout on the shortwave frequencies here in North America.
Blame satilite radio services (XM and Sirius) combine that with the
adgenda of the WTO.

You gotta be a masochist to put up with the static and distortion
while program listening. Why put precious tax dollars into klunky
tube transmitters when more elegant delivery methods are available?


Because it's more fun. It gives you a sense of accomplishment.


Darn right! That satellite stuff is for 'tard boys who couldn't figure out how
to put up an antenna or tune a shortwave receiver if their sorry lives depended
upon it.

Long live shortwave and shortwave DX'ing.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #9   Report Post  
Old May 15th 05, 08:45 PM
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 15 May 2005 16:46:55 +0100, "M. J. Powell"
wrote:

In message , David
writes
On 14 May 2005 21:16:45 -0700, "Bushido Hacks"
wrote:

Radio blackout on the shortwave frequencies here in North America.
Blame satilite radio services (XM and Sirius) combine that with the
adgenda of the WTO.

You gotta be a masochist to put up with the static and distortion
while program listening. Why put precious tax dollars into klunky
tube transmitters when more elegant delivery methods are available?


Because it's more fun. It gives you a sense of accomplishment.

Mike

So the taxpayers of the world should subsidize our ''hobby''?

  #10   Report Post  
Old May 15th 05, 08:48 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



David wrote:

On Sun, 15 May 2005 16:46:55 +0100, "M. J. Powell"
wrote:

In message , David
writes
On 14 May 2005 21:16:45 -0700, "Bushido Hacks"
wrote:

Radio blackout on the shortwave frequencies here in North America.
Blame satilite radio services (XM and Sirius) combine that with the
adgenda of the WTO.

You gotta be a masochist to put up with the static and distortion
while program listening. Why put precious tax dollars into klunky
tube transmitters when more elegant delivery methods are available?


Because it's more fun. It gives you a sense of accomplishment.

Mike

So the taxpayers of the world should subsidize our ''hobby''?


'Your' hobby 'tard boy...? Satellite receivers are 'your' hobby. (That and
posting off the wall crap).

Now go hit the sidewalk and tote it.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BBC World Service and BBC Monitoring Mike Terry Broadcasting 0 April 11th 05 03:37 AM
[Alternate History] What if: BBC World Service Relay Station in the Faukland Islands (c. 1977) ... Max Power Shortwave 2 April 9th 05 02:04 AM
BBC World Service Schedule Arthur Heely Shortwave 7 August 30th 04 05:03 PM
BBC World Service DRM via Bonaire Mike Terry Shortwave 0 June 11th 04 01:10 PM
Broadcast Station Field Strengths.. Reg Edwards Antenna 3 December 29th 03 02:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017