Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic RF-2200
Does anyone know what the specs are for the wide and narrow filters,
i.e. the bandwidth and shape factors? I love this radio but the narrow filter doesn't seem to make very much of a difference to my ears, as far as interference rejection goes. Has anyone ever replaced either filter with good results, and what filter did you use? Thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
willismat wrote:
Does anyone know what the specs are for the wide and narrow filters, i.e. the bandwidth and shape factors? I love this radio but the narrow filter doesn't seem to make very much of a difference to my ears, as far as interference rejection goes. Has anyone ever replaced either filter with good results, and what filter did you use? Thanks! --------------------------------- I once checked the filters, but it was back in the early 1980s. I can remember they were both rather wide. I thought about trying to replace them, but the tunning wasn't fine enough and the receiver wasn't stable enough for the effort. It had great sound on FM and good sound quality, in spite of the over wide fitlers, on AM an SW. I loaned mine to a friend and it was destroyed along with her car. One simple mod you might want to consider is to add a 7806 linear regulator, with a switch hidden in the battery compartment in the little space intended for the earphone. It was a fun radio to take on picnics and camping. I have often thought of buying another one, but I have "too" many radios. Or at least not enough space to stash many more. I think the RF200 had a "stnadard" 455KHz IF, and if so, then scalvaged CB IF filters ought to work. The RF2200 is not at all crowded inside. Good luck on your quest. A good"cheap" source of narrow filters can be the lowly CB. I picked up several at the local thrift stores for next to nothing when they are missing the mics. I even got a couple of SSB units that had nice, narrow ceramic filters. Next to nothing means less then 5$. Garage sales are another good source. It helps if your wife has friends who think garage sales are a Holy mandate. I have a set deal, buy me all the CBs you find for $5 or less. I help with their home PCs os it balances out. Terry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I've used several of the Panasonic RF-2xxx series. My impression was
that the filter positions were best described as wide and wider with outward curving skirts. They were useful in AM mode but were too wide for ssb in the crowded ham bands. A good announcer on a shortwave station in the clear sounds great in the wide position and pretty darned good in narrow. The downside to installing a narrow communications filter is that you could compromise sound quality on AM broadcasts. If it were me I would enjoy the 2200 for what it is and find a good tabletop with better filters and the requisite stability to handle ssb. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
the RF-2200 does not have "real" ceramic filters. like the 2800, there are
just some tuned circuits for selectivity in the wide mode and in the narrow mode a "transfilter" is switched in. therefore selectivity is quite cheesy. to combat this, I am in the process of creating a SUPER RF-2800 !!!!! I have added an LF-D6 filter in the wide position and will be adding a coax antenna input for my portable ramsey AA7 custom antenna. I am looking into other things so soup up. I will report on this as it progresses. the RF-2200 can be significantly improved with quality ceramic filters. Radio West in the early 80's used to offer a collins mechanical filter upgrade for the 2800/2900. My FRG-7700 has two of these upgrade filters, 1.9 and 2.9 wrote in message oups.com... Does anyone know what the specs are for the wide and narrow filters, i.e. the bandwidth and shape factors? I love this radio but the narrow filter doesn't seem to make very much of a difference to my ears, as far as interference rejection goes. Has anyone ever replaced either filter with good results, and what filter did you use? Thanks! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Leonard Martin wrote:
A good"cheap" source of narrow filters can be the lowly CB. I picked up several at the local thrift stores for next to nothing when they are missing the mics. I even got a couple of SSB units that had nice, narrow ceramic filters. Next to nothing means less then 5$. Terry What do you do with all those CBs? Leonard Leonard Martin Jun 22, 10:38 pm show options Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave From: Leonard Martin - Find messages by this author Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:38:39 -0500 Local: Wed,Jun 22 2005 10:38 pm Subject: Panasonic RF-2200 Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Jun 29, 10:38 pm). In article .com, - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - wrote: willismat wrote: Does anyone know what the specs are for the wide and narrow filters, i.e. the bandwidth and shape factors? I love this radio but the narrow filter doesn't seem to make very much of a difference to my ears, as far as interference rejection goes. Has anyone ever replaced either filter with good results, and what filter did you use? Thanks! --------------------------------- I once checked the filters, but it was back in the early 1980s. I can remember they were both rather wide. I thought about trying to replace them, but the tunning wasn't fine enough and the receiver wasn't stable enough for the effort. It had great sound on FM and good sound quality, in spite of the over wide fitlers, on AM an SW. I loaned mine to a friend and it was destroyed along with her car. One simple mod you might want to consider is to add a 7806 linear regulator, with a switch hidden in the battery compartment in the little space intended for the earphone. It was a fun radio to take on picnics and camping. I have often thought of buying another one, but I have "too" many radios. Or at least not enough space to stash many more. I think the RF200 had a "stnadard" 455KHz IF, and if so, then scalvaged CB IF filters ought to work. The RF2200 is not at all crowded inside. Good luck on your quest. A good"cheap" source of narrow filters can be the lowly CB. I picked up several at the local thrift stores for next to nothing when they are missing the mics. I even got a couple of SSB units that had nice, narrow ceramic filters. Next to nothing means less then 5$. Garage sales are another good source. It helps if your wife has friends who think garage sales are a Holy mandate. I have a set deal, buy me all the CBs you find for $5 or less. I help with their home PCs os it balances out. Terry What do you do with all those CBs? Leonard -- "Everything that rises must converge" --Flannery O'Connor ------------------------------------- I have been hunting for better Murata ceramic IF fitlers. I have several radios to upgrade. I have converted several to "outboard" IF strips. Buffer the 455 KHz in a SW, feed it to the modified CB and instant better, as in more slective receiver. And some of the better ones I fix and give/trade to friends. The SSB ones are worth converting to 10 mtrs. Several of us have an very informal net on 10mtrs. I like to experiment. I have a very nice sears(Uniden) SSB that I plan on convering to 17Mtrs. I always have more interests then time. Murata no longer sells the really nice fitlers, so unless one has a vender with some stashed, this is the only way to get them. I generally get a CB a month. CBs are full of usefull RF parts. RF Power transistors, RF chokes etc. But the best ceramic filters pales when compared to a even a poor crystal filter. And good crystal filters must be heard to be aprreciated. You can stack up to 3 simialr ceramic fitlers for improved skirts. But crystal filters are better. And expensive. When I get the chance I am going to replace the stock filters in our(my wife and I each have one)DX398s. Terry ----------------------------------------------------- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
) writes: Leonard Martin wrote: A good"cheap" source of narrow filters can be the lowly CB. I picked up several at the local thrift stores for next to nothing when they are missing the mics. I even got a couple of SSB units that had nice, narrow ceramic filters. Next to nothing means less then 5$. Terry What do you do with all those CBs? He just said, he uses them as a source of cheap but narrower filters. Michael |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks to all who replied. The only information I could find on filter
specs, which I'm really curious about now, is from DXing.com's website regarding two other Panasonic portables of the time. The specs for those a RF-2600 6 and 4 kHz RF-2800 5 and 3.4 kHz I've never used either of these two radios, but I have to think that the 2200 is more likely to be the same as the 2600 as far as bandwidth goes. The wide is fine for general program listening when there's little interference, but when it's needed the narrow doesn't usually come to the rescue. If the 2200 does use tuned circuits then it would be best to accept it as it is and be happy with what it does do well, and get a desktop for the tougher signals. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
actually, the 2800 was of the same era as the 2200. the 2600 came out years
later, being a cheaper version of the 2900. definitely, a properly selected desktop or modified laptop would be a better choice. remember, just because something is a desktop doesn't make it better. there have been quite a few desktops over the past few years that need significant help with selectivity ! the Drake R8 and SW8 series are some of the few that don't need any help. even some of the $1000 receivers required optional filters to work well. the R5000 being the most notable. wrote in message ups.com... Thanks to all who replied. The only information I could find on filter specs, which I'm really curious about now, is from DXing.com's website regarding two other Panasonic portables of the time. The specs for those a RF-2600 6 and 4 kHz RF-2800 5 and 3.4 kHz I've never used either of these two radios, but I have to think that the 2200 is more likely to be the same as the 2600 as far as bandwidth goes. The wide is fine for general program listening when there's little interference, but when it's needed the narrow doesn't usually come to the rescue. If the 2200 does use tuned circuits then it would be best to accept it as it is and be happy with what it does do well, and get a desktop for the tougher signals. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Panasonic RFB11 ? Sony ICF-SW11 ? Sangean SG-622 ? Grundig Yacht Boy 205 | Shortwave | |||
VT Communications B'04 | Shortwave | |||
Panasonic RF-2200 - Recent News and Info | Shortwave | |||
Technical question: Panasonic RF3100 receiver | Shortwave | |||
Panasonic 4900 vs. FRG 7 | Shortwave |