Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let's try that again.............AM receivers don't have a deemphasis
circuit. You can state that the composite response of an AM receiver implies a deemphasis circuit, but that is not really true if you consider a deemphasis circuit as having a standard turnover frequency and a standard rolloff characteristic (so many dB per octave). (I do understand your point, though). A deemphasis circuit, as applied after the detector in FM receivers is designed to have a specific rolloff characteristic that is the complement of the preemphasis characteristic applied at the transmitting end. This holds true for broadcast stations as well as land mobile equipment. Take a look at any of the more recent stereo FM tuners/receivers and you will see that this characteristic is determined by the external components in the line amp of the stereo decoder chip. A TDA1591 data sheet gives a good example of this circuit. And you are right.....it would be very difficult to have a standard preemphasis curve for AM stations, because there are so my receivers with different characteristics because of different I.F. bandwidths and different rolloff characteristics in the audio chain. Pete "Richard Fry" wrote in message ... "Pete KE9OA" As far as AM receivers, they do not have a deemphasis circuit following the detector. With FM receivers, it is a different story. ___________ But in effect, almost every AM receiver has de-emphasis -- it is the result of the "haystack" amplitude response of their RF/IF circuits driving the 2nd detector. Higher modulating frequencies are rolled off, sometimes very severely. The problem with trying to compensate for it at the AM tx is that the amount needed for "flat" system response varies considerably from rx to rx, and even with carrier frequency. Even so, many MW/SW AM stations do boost their highs, trying to get some of it to pass through the narrowband receivers typically in use these days. RF |