| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
July 21st 05, 03:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "beerbarrel" wrote in message ... On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 07:31:02 -0400, dxAce wrote: Joel Rubin wrote: On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:33:36 -0700, "John Smith" wrote: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-05-143A1.doc John Code ability should be one alternative among other technical tests. It seems very odd to freeze a technical test in a museum of bygone technology. If one cannot learn at least a minimal 5 WPM code then they have absolutely no business obtaining an amateur license. dxAce Michigan USA Agreed! Wazziss??? I'm in full agreement with Tracy and Steve on something.. *looks around for the four horsemen of the apocolypse*  It would be more of an incentive for me to get my ticket if I could use HF. I have ZERO interest in CW. Maybe open a little HF for techs? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF | CB | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| FCC to Drop HF Code Requirement | Boatanchors | |||
| There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate | Policy | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
