Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 21st 05, 08:18 PM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John S.:

You will learn, logic will get you no where here, these guys simply
have a "religious bent" for CW, if feeds their ego in some weird way I
cannot fathom and makes 'em feel "special."

Give up, the sum of their combined ignorance is much larger than the
pool of logic which available...

John

"John S." wrote in message
oups.com...


beerbarrel wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:29:37 -0400, Cmdr Buzz Corey
wrote:

John S. wrote:


Yes, or require that prospective drivers be proficient in the
use of a
buggy whip in addition to passing a written and practical
driving test.


If they are going to drive a buggy, it might be a good idea.




Maybe we should just drop the driving test altogether...well start
with your kids.


And that's the point. The written and practical drivers test is a
measure of whether a prospective driver knows something about the
law
and theory of driving and has some proficiency in the operation of a
motor vehicle.

The written amateur test proves that the owner has some knowlege of
the
theory of radio construction and operation.

The morse code test only tests the ability to translate a language
for
which there is no practical use. It does not shed any light on the
ability if the prospective ham to operate a ham radio in a safe and
courteous manner. A live on-the-air test of a prospective ham
setting
up a rig and using voice or one of the digital modes would prove
something about his competence as a radio operator.

Copying morse code proves nothing.



  #2   Report Post  
Old July 21st 05, 11:49 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And the sum of your combined,,,,,,,,,
cuhulin

  #3   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 05, 12:02 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

.... even should your personal attack on me be successful, there is the
real issue we are discussing here...

.... get a life, get a brain, you are one champion fool. Not hard to
tell you are a canook! (oh, was that a personal attack I just did?
grin)

John

wrote in message
...
And the sum of your combined,,,,,,,,,
cuhulin



  #4   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 05, 12:45 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Not a personal attack.And I am not a canuk,I am a Champion Mississippi
Coonass.
cuhulin

  #5   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 05, 01:20 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

LOL...

Never seen one-o-those type of Mississippians before!

Might be worth takin' a look at ya!

ROFLOL!!!

.... good humor... grin

John

wrote in message
...
Not a personal attack.And I am not a canuk,I am a Champion
Mississippi
Coonass.
cuhulin





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF John Smith CB 90 August 5th 05 02:54 AM
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 05:41 PM
FCC to Drop HF Code Requirement David Stinson Boatanchors 41 August 29th 03 02:33 AM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate N2EY Policy 1 July 31st 03 10:33 PM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017