| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
YEAH!!!
Hide all the answers and require 'em to come up with the answers psychically!!! ROFLOL! Get real, any college is test smart, any CS/EE technology student will blow the doors off any test any panel can come up with in damn short order. John "MnMikew" wrote in message ... "beerbarrel" wrote in message ... On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:39:12 -0400, dxAce wrote: John Plimmer wrote: I couldn't agree more with dropping CW from the ham test. It reminds me of the legal profession here in South Africa. It used to be a requirement that lawyers had to pass Latin in high school and have at least two courses in Latin for their law degree. That was scrapped about ten years ago amid loud protests from the dinosaurs. Today the law profession is flourishing more than ever before with high quality judges and advocates. The only thing I have noticed is that the high and mighty no longer spew out Latin quotations = R.I.P. Our SARL (South African Radio League) ham club is diminishing by the year and the once crowded ham bands are now empty. We need to make it easier for new entrants to come into this wonderful hobby. Why does everything need to be made easier? Can't the 'tards learn the code? If so, WHY can't the 'tards learn the code? If ordinary folks could pass the test in years past what is so different today? Laziness? dxAce Michigan USA BINGO! It seems everybody wants something for nothing these days. What do you mean nothing? There's still a test. Remove the CW and make the tests harder then. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF | CB | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| FCC to Drop HF Code Requirement | Boatanchors | |||
| There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate | Policy | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||