LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old July 23rd 05, 06:11 PM
John S.
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Mark Zenier wrote:
In article ,
John Smith wrote:
Tell me, what is/are a legitimate argument(s) to keep CW a
requirement, which any sane man/woman could argue with real and
logical conviction?


The real reason for the Morse requirement was, (three quarters of a
century ago or so, after WW I), to maintain a pool of people that could
be inducted into the military in times of war to maintain communications
on the battlefield. Learning Morse is not a natural act. Nor, for more
than a small percentage of the population, very easy. Getting a bunch
of Signal Corps cannon fodder to train themselves was a great boon.

Back about 20 years ago, when Digital Signal Processor ICs were first
coming out, I did a bunch of library research on the possiblity of
building a box that could match the performance of a human operator.
The newest paper I could find on the actual use of CW, in the open
literature, was from 1959. They were no longer interested in using it.
It takes too long to train an operator, and the data transmission capacity
is too low. And if the radio operator gets shot...

(There was, reportedly, a lot of expertise in the NSA and its military
affiliates in automated CW intercepts, as the Soviet Union and third
world still had a lot of tactical comm. in CW at that time).

But at that same time, 20 years ago, I got some insight, (at a job
interview), into what the miltary was planning for the future. It was
automating an entire infantry division with packet radio. Not much
reason to learn Morse code when the field radios had 20 kbps (?) packet
modems built in, and the field officers could just plug the Grid portable
into them.

So the military no longer has any need and it's taken 40 years
for the ham "community" to figure this out.


Unfortunately a large portion of the ham community has chosen to ignore
the fact that morse code is not used in any significant communications
in the western world. They cling to the outdated notion that group of
radio amateurs with the ability to transcribe morse code at some slow
speed will serve some useful purpose in an emergency situation. That
none of the professional services could hear them if they were to
transmit morese code in an emergency seems to escape most currently
licensed hams. They seem to enjoy Walter Mitty like daydreams where
the hams all hit the spectrum to save the little community when the
hurricane hits. I have an EE in the family who helps design
communications systems for the defense dept. When the office shop talk
turns to hams and mars operators they just sort of chuckle about how
far out of date those mostly old guys really are.



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF John Smith CB 90 August 5th 05 02:54 AM
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 05:41 PM
FCC to Drop HF Code Requirement David Stinson Boatanchors 41 August 29th 03 02:33 AM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate N2EY Policy 1 July 31st 03 10:33 PM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017