Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mark Zenier wrote: In article , John Smith wrote: Tell me, what is/are a legitimate argument(s) to keep CW a requirement, which any sane man/woman could argue with real and logical conviction? The real reason for the Morse requirement was, (three quarters of a century ago or so, after WW I), to maintain a pool of people that could be inducted into the military in times of war to maintain communications on the battlefield. Learning Morse is not a natural act. Nor, for more than a small percentage of the population, very easy. Getting a bunch of Signal Corps cannon fodder to train themselves was a great boon. Back about 20 years ago, when Digital Signal Processor ICs were first coming out, I did a bunch of library research on the possiblity of building a box that could match the performance of a human operator. The newest paper I could find on the actual use of CW, in the open literature, was from 1959. They were no longer interested in using it. It takes too long to train an operator, and the data transmission capacity is too low. And if the radio operator gets shot... (There was, reportedly, a lot of expertise in the NSA and its military affiliates in automated CW intercepts, as the Soviet Union and third world still had a lot of tactical comm. in CW at that time). But at that same time, 20 years ago, I got some insight, (at a job interview), into what the miltary was planning for the future. It was automating an entire infantry division with packet radio. Not much reason to learn Morse code when the field radios had 20 kbps (?) packet modems built in, and the field officers could just plug the Grid portable into them. So the military no longer has any need and it's taken 40 years for the ham "community" to figure this out. Unfortunately a large portion of the ham community has chosen to ignore the fact that morse code is not used in any significant communications in the western world. They cling to the outdated notion that group of radio amateurs with the ability to transcribe morse code at some slow speed will serve some useful purpose in an emergency situation. That none of the professional services could hear them if they were to transmit morese code in an emergency seems to escape most currently licensed hams. They seem to enjoy Walter Mitty like daydreams where the hams all hit the spectrum to save the little community when the hurricane hits. I have an EE in the family who helps design communications systems for the defense dept. When the office shop talk turns to hams and mars operators they just sort of chuckle about how far out of date those mostly old guys really are. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF | CB | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FCC to Drop HF Code Requirement | Boatanchors | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |