On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:47:48 GMT, David wrote:

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:47:16 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote:


On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:52:39 GMT, David wrote:

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:15:49 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote:


Main Entry: rac·ism
Pronunciation: 'rA-"si-z&m also -"shi-
Function: noun
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and
capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority
of a particular race
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination

In that case, do you believe that your race is inherently superior? In
which particular regard(s)?

Of course not.

"Of course"? That's really good. In that case, how do you justify your
earlier statement about "crazy white guys"?

We are a significant part of nature, and we are certainly living in
harmony with it, precisely within our means, perfectly sustainably.
All that noble leftie talk about "unsustainability" is pure hogwash -
designed by power and publicity seekers to make us feel guilty about
ourselves.

That sounds faith based.

Firstly, it is up to those who make claims for us to be blindly
believed such unsustainability, the benefits of this mysterious
"harmony with nature", etc., to prove they are not faith-based. I
don't make any such claims which would require a proof. The onus of
proof is on the other side.

Secondly, there is a lot of objective scientific evidence to show that
all this fashionable alarmist talk about unsustainability is a
hogwash, and the romantic notions about "harmony with nature" are not
grounded in reality (and never were at any given time in the past).
But I am sure you would not want to hear the truth.

There are many folks who seem to loathe the society they are living
in, yet enjoying all its benefits; full of a pent-up anger and
inferiority complex, looking for an outlet. If you ever develop a
heart problem, I suggest you to go to a witch doctor, perfectly in
harmony with nature. Just avoid the "crazy white guy's" science at all
cost.

Take it easy and enjoy life: It is surely better than it ever was, and
it is getting even better. And do something more productive than
beating everyone around yourself and preaching guilt, loathing and
hatred.

You are living in a fantasy construct.

It would have been enough to say simply "you are living in a fantasy",
or "you are living in a fantasy world". But you just had to use the
oh-so-fashionable (in the leftie world) word "construct", didn't you.
It makes you look oh-so-smart!

I guess it's OK if you are content to *look* smart instead of *be*
smart.

Peter Newman

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:09:33 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote:

Are you a Dominionist?

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:32:53 GMT, David wrote:

Are you a Dominionist?

No, I don't see the need for a human of a sound mind to subscribe to
any religion at all. (Sadly, unlike most; including yourself, it
would seem.) I rely solely on reason, logic and the scientific
method. You might perhaps say that I am an objectivist.

Peter Newman

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:18:05 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote:


On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:32:53 GMT, David wrote:

Are you a Dominionist?

No, I don't see the need for a human of a sound mind to subscribe to
any religion at all. (Sadly, unlike most; including yourself, it
would seem.) I rely solely on reason, logic and the scientific
method. You might perhaps say that I am an objectivist.

Peter Newman

http://www.thomhartmann.com/deathof.shtml

I am the true Prophet.Now,prop y'alls selfs up and listen to
me.Haw,Haw,Haw!
cuhulin

TGxveWQgRGF2aWVzIHdhcyBhbmQgaXMgdGhlIG9ubHkgdHJ1ZS Bwcm9waGV0Li4uDQoNClRIT1Ug
U0hBTFQgTk9UIEJFQVIgRE9XTiBUTyBQUkFZIFRPIEZBTFNFIF BST1BIRVRTLCBTTyBTQVlUSCBU
SEUgTE9SRCENCg0KTG9uZyBsaXZlIERhdmllcyEhISENCg0KSm 9obg0KDQo8Y3VodWxpbkB3ZWJ0
di5uZXQ+IHdyb3RlIGluIG1lc3NhZ2UgbmV3czo4NTA4LTQyRT Y1QjAzLTI3M0BzdG9yZWZ1bGwt
MzI1My5iYXkud2VidHYubmV0Li4uDQo+SSBhbSB0aGUgdHJ1ZS BQcm9waGV0Lk5vdyxwcm9wIHkn
YWxscyBzZWxmcyB1cCBhbmQgbGlzdGVuIHRvDQo+IG1lLkhhdy xIYXcsSGF3IQ0KPiBjdWh1bGlu
DQo+

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:29:28 GMT, David wrote:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:18:05 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote:


On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:32:53 GMT, David wrote:

Are you a Dominionist?

No, I don't see the need for a human of a sound mind to subscribe to
any religion at all. (Sadly, unlike most; including yourself, it
would seem.) I rely solely on reason, logic and the scientific
method. You might perhaps say that I am an objectivist.

Peter Newman

http://www.thomhartmann.com/deathof.shtml


I don't see why I should even bother answering an article that starts
with a quote of Karl Marx! Anything this man has every said has been
discredited in practice, and millions of people suffered in the
process. Anyone who still seriously believes in the dead horse of
Marxism has no brain left.

Let me remind you that I started this thread with Churchill's comments
about Islam. You then retorted with a derisive statement of "crazy
white men", presumably in defence of Islam. Now you turned to dying
trees and environmentalism. Just another convenient way to badmouth
those "crazy white men" who brought us the very civilization that
feeds you and that you just love to despise, right?

You should really look into the mirror and admit to yourself frankly
why you hate civilization so much. You feel left a bit behind, don't
you? Some deep-seated inferioity complex perhaps?

Ah, about those dying trees, all you romantic tree huggers should read
this: http://www.lomborg.com/books.htm
(But I don't really expect you to believe it - of course, it was
written by a white guy.)

Peter Newman

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:43:23 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote:


I don't see why I should even bother answering an article that starts
with a quote of Karl Marx! Anything this man has every said has been
discredited in practice, and millions of people suffered in the
process. Anyone who still seriously believes in the dead horse of
Marxism has no brain left.

Let me remind you that I started this thread with Churchill's comments
about Islam. You then retorted with a derisive statement of "crazy
white men", presumably in defence of Islam.

You go to war to secure the instrument of your demise (petroleum).
That's pretty wack.

Now you turned to dying
trees and environmentalism. Just another convenient way to badmouth
those "crazy white men" who brought us the very civilization that
feeds you and that you just love to despise, right?

You call this a hot-dog?

You should really look into the mirror and admit to yourself frankly
why you hate civilization so much. You feel left a bit behind, don't
you? Some deep-seated inferioity complex perhaps?

More of a love/hate relationship with ''civilization'' as you call it.

Ah, about those dying trees, all you romantic tree huggers should read
this: http://www.lomborg.com/books.htm
(But I don't really expect you to believe it - of course, it was
written by a white guy.)

Peter Newman



''The Future
The deforestation of tropical rain forests is a threat to life
worldwide. Deforestation may have profound effects on global climate
and cause the extinction of thousands of species annually.''

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Lib...station_4.html

Written by our best scientific minds.

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:22:21 GMT, David wrote:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:43:23 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote:


I don't see why I should even bother answering an article that starts
with a quote of Karl Marx! Anything this man has every said has been
discredited in practice, and millions of people suffered in the
process. Anyone who still seriously believes in the dead horse of
Marxism has no brain left.


#1:

Let me remind you that I started this thread with Churchill's comments
about Islam. You then retorted with a derisive statement of "crazy
white men", presumably in defence of Islam.

You go to war to secure the instrument of your demise (petroleum).
That's pretty wack.

Go back to point #1 above. What you replied makes no sense whatsover
in the context of this discussion: I did not go to any war for
petroleum, and petroleum is certainly not an instrument of my demise.
If you meant to say that the US (or all "crazy white men"?), then
exactly the same applies.

Let me also suggest that you stop driving a car, don't use any public
transport, immediately switch off any electrical appliances in your
home, including your computer.

I wonder where you live. I bet you live somewhere where you don't have
to work too hard, thanks to the very civilization that you hate so
much. You know what? You are simply bored. Move somewhere where you
will need to work really hard in order to be able to eat and have a
decent roof above your head. Then you will see things from a different
perspective and take fewer things for granted.

#2:

Now you turned to dying
trees and environmentalism. Just another convenient way to badmouth
those "crazy white men" who brought us the very civilization that
feeds you and that you just love to despise, right?

You call this a hot-dog?

You don't make sense. Go back to #2 above and then switch on your
brain.

You should really look into the mirror and admit to yourself frankly
why you hate civilization so much. You feel left a bit behind, don't
you? Some deep-seated inferioity complex perhaps?

More of a love/hate relationship with ''civilization'' as you call it.

Time to make an appointment with a psychiatrist as soon as possible.

Ah, about those dying trees, all you romantic tree huggers should read
this: http://www.lomborg.com/books.htm
(But I don't really expect you to believe it - of course, it was
written by a white guy.)

''The Future
The deforestation of tropical rain forests is a threat to life
worldwide. Deforestation may have profound effects on global climate
and cause the extinction of thousands of species annually.''

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Lib...station_4.html

Written by our best scientific minds.

Says someone who really desperately *wants* to believe this
politically correct crap. You are simply seeking justification for
your anger and hatred, whose real reason is your very own inferiority
complex - just be a man and admit it to yourself.

Buy the Lomborg book and get the *real* story, from a *real*
scientist. I promise this will be an eye opener for you. But I guess
you don't really want to open your eyes, do you. You like it better
this way - the more alarmist, the more apocalyptic, the more proving
of your "crazy white men" crap, then the better it feels, because you
just like to wallow in that negativity, like a pig in ****, don't you!

I started this thread talking about Muslims. But you are talking about
deforestation. I guess you don't realize that by desperately searching
for any suitable negative subject to justify your initial "crazy white
men" outburst, you are precisely confirming what I am saying - you are
entirely messed up. I hope it is not too late for you. You *can* fix
your brain up, but first you do need to be honest to yourself.


Peter Newman

Peter Newman wrote:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:32:53 GMT, David wrote:

Are you a Dominionist?

No, I don't see the need for a human of a sound mind to subscribe to
any religion at all. (Sadly, unlike most; including yourself, it
would seem.) I rely solely on reason, logic and the scientific
method. You might perhaps say that I am an objectivist.

An Objectivist, meaning a follower of Ayn Rand? Or merely a secular
humanist?


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----