www.tenc.net
cuhulin

"-=jd=-" wrote in message jd. Why do guys
keep beating a dead horse with this guy? I kinda wish you
all would just ignor the mf. He's mentally ill you know? GFC

B.H.




It's recreational?

-=jd=-


Whew! wipes brow I was fearful that maybe you guys thought you could talk
sense into him? I should have given you more credit. Carry on.

B.H.

On 31 Jul 2005 18:55:06 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:

I say ''smarts'' is bigger than any being and a value inherent in the
universe. There is an original DNA molecule who likes to travel.


Opinions vary dramatically...


-=jd=-
Not my idea of drama. It's really not at all imortant.

We're here, but not for much longer, because we have dilled the
Airstream.

On 31 Jul 2005 18:56:11 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:



God knows everything

Nobody knows everything

God is Nobody



You are making gross presumptions again, I see...

-=jd=-
Technically, that was a ''deduction'' not a ''presumption''...

"David" wrote in message


Technically, that was a ''deduction'' not a ''presumption''...


No you cant deduce because your reasoning is flawed and therefore you've
been bumped back into the presumption dept. Mr. Rickets! Good Day!

B.H.

DaviD - When the 'finite' becomes the "INFINITE" . . .
e.g. When the 'infinite' becomes the "FINITE" . . .
http://www.captainatlantis.com/newagep15.htm

On 31 Jul 2005 11:36:48 -0700, "RHF"
wrote:

DaviD - When the 'finite' becomes the "INFINITE" . . .
e.g. When the 'infinite' becomes the "FINITE" . . .
http://www.captainatlantis.com/newagep15.htm
.
What Comes Around (Physical) Goes Around {Meta-Physical}
http://www.autopenhosting.org/direct...mic-space.html

.
" God is Nobody " = God Is (In) Everybody
http://www.carm.org/islam/obj_God_finite.htm
[ Therefore - God Is In Each Of Us ]
.
As Carl Sagan Said "We Are Made of Star Stuff"
http://www.skeptic.com/04.4.sagan-tribute.html
http://www.stmarys.ca/academic/conte...e1/page01.html

.
Simply Open Up Your Heart and Let Him {God} In/Out - Amen ~ RHF
. . . . .

We were talking - about the space between us all
And the people - who hide themselves behind a
wall of illusion
Never glimpse the truth - then it's far too late -
when they pass away.

We were talking - about the love we all could
share - when we find it
To try our best to hold it there - with our love
With our love - we could save the world - if
they only knew.

Try to realise it's all within yourself no-one else
can make you change
And to see you're really only very small,
and life flows on within you and without you.

We were talking - about the love that's gone so
cold and the people,
Who gain the world and lose their soul -
they don't know - they can't see - are you one
of them?

When you've seen beyond yourself - then you
may find, peace of mind is waiting there -
And the time will come when you see
we're all one, and life flows on within you and
without you.

--George Harrison

On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:07:04 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote:



"-=jd=-" wrote in message jd. Why do guys
keep beating a dead horse with this guy? I kinda wish you
all would just ignor the mf. He's mentally ill you know? GFC

B.H.




It's recreational?

-=jd=-


Whew! wipes brow I was fearful that maybe you guys thought you could talk
sense into him? I should have given you more credit. Carry on.

B.H.


Who are you? One of those pricks who gets ''hall monitor'' duty and
gets a big head about it?

What's an mf? Massey Ferguson Farm Tractors?
cuhulin

"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 20...
On Sat 30 Jul 2005 05:01:49p, "Honus"
wrote in message news:1VRGe.6080$Tk6.5106@trnddc02:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 20...
On Fri 29 Jul 2005 07:47:51p, "Honus"
wrote in message news:HezGe.63$4e6.53@trnddc04:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 20...

If you want to believe everything evolved or "just happened" by
pure,
random chance, then that same logic would have you believe that a
tornado
could pass through a junk-yard and spit out a functioning Boeing
747,
just
by pure, random chance.

That, of course, is a -thorough- mischaracterization of biological
evolution.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/abioprob.html


http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/chance/chance.html



It is an over-generalization, but the root-point is the same. The
fossil
record provides evidence of many different forms of life -- but there
have
been no transitional forms found, save for a scant few lizards that
appeared to have feather-like features that have been presumed to be
the
onset of birds. Well, that's still a presumption, or a leap in logic or
faith that is loosely based on fact, but not completely supported by
the
historical record. Perhaps one day it may be, but not yet.

There are quite a few more transitionals than you realize.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html



Which still requires "leaps in logic/faith" to span the gaps. It is
sprinkled with phrases similar to "we don't know", "remains unknown", etc.

Another creationist fallacy. Anytime a fossil is found that neatly fits
between two others, creationists point out that the new discovery merely
creates two more gaps. If we have #1 and #3 and then add #2, the question
immediately arises "Where is 1.5?" It's never ending, no amount of
transitionals will satisfy, and a perfect line of of descent with
mother/daughter type relationships isn't going to be found. The therapsid to
mammal chain is particularly fine-grained, though. It's worth investigating,
for so-inclined.

But the evolutionist is "convinced" in his belief nonetheless. Because of
that, I see little difference between the two camps.

I humbly suggest you look much harder.