And the Leftists are silent.

North Korea’s Nukes: Will the Free World Ever Learn?
Communists cannot be trusted

By D.J. McGuire
China e-Lobby http://www.geocities.com/china_e_lobby/
Jul 29, 2005

Another round of talks on Stalinist North Korea’s nuclear weapons began July
26 in Beijing, and unlike the previous three rounds, they opened with soft
words, an open-ended timetable, and an outward determination on the part of
all involved—the United States, the Stalinists, Communist China, Japan,
Russia, and South Korea, to reach an agreement that will lead to complete
denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
In other words, we’re in big trouble.

Lest anyone forget, these talks are the fourth attempt to get the Stalinist
regime to agree to stop breaking the promise it made in 1994 under the
Agreed Framework, which itself included a promise to stop breaking a promise
it made in 1985 to never develop nuclear weapons. Each time, the Stalinists
were offered concessions in exchange for their supposed willingness to
return to the status quo ante. Each time, the United States and her
allies—Japan and South Korea—brought themselves back to the table to repair
what the Stalinists themselves ruptured. This time, however, the situation
is different: the Chinese Communist Party is in the game, keeping a close
eye over the actions of its allies.

In other words, we’re in really big trouble.

These talks are based on one flaw—a flaw large enough to make the entire
episode, including the agreement it spawns a dangerous mistake. That flaw is
the assumption that Communists can be trusted.

One would have hoped Stalinist-in-chief Kim Jong-il would have already
proven that with his broken nuclear promises and his downright heartless
dishonesty on the issue of Japanese abductions. To this day, Kim has
insisted that eight of the thirteen Japanese abducted by his regime have
died, without a shred of evidence to back it up (the regime insisted the
bodies were swept away by a flood). Naturally, Japan, who has been a member
of the six-party talks since they started, has insisted this issue be
resolved. However, it appears the old arms control shibboleth—any agreement
by definition is a good agreement—is holding sway again. The dovish
government of South Korea is telling Japan to, in effect, put a sock in it,
while the U.S. appears to be ignoring the abduction issue entirely.

Meanwhile, the Stalinists are already building on significant concessions
they won before this round of talks even began. In October 2002, when the
Stalinists boasted of their uranium-weaponization program, a bold-faced
violation of the 1994 agreement, the U.S. insisted the entire program be
eliminated before even discussions of aid to the regime would begin. Last
year, in the third round of the talks, the U.S. had offered to let the aid
spigot be turned on before one single nuclear weapon was destroyed. This
time, the Stalinists also want the U.S. to stop sending nuclear submarines
anywhere near Korea, and is calling for a full-fledged peace treaty (their
previous demand was a non-aggression pact)—plus, of course, an immediate
resumption of aid. The dovish South has already offered to plug the
Stalinist regime into its electricity grid if it merely agrees to disarm—a
move Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has already endorsed.

Why are so many democratic officials telegraphing their intentions to simply
take Kim Jong-il at his word? We are told this agreement will be different
because the Stalinist North would have to break its word to five other
parties, not just one. Specifically cited is the Stalinists’ oldest ally—the
Chinese Communist regime. This is where things really go off-track.
How can anyone take the Chinese Communist Party at its word on the actions
of its ally? This is the same regime that insisted Saddam Hussein was not a
threat to the free world as it was selling him missile parts and helping him
to integrate his air defense network. This is the regime that merrily
repeats Khomeinist Iran’s assertion that its nuclear development is
“peaceful” as it helps the mullahs develop nuclear weapons.

This is also the regime that piously told the world it wanted a
“nuclear-free peninsula” in Korea while selling Kim Jong-il tributyl
phosphate, a chemical essential for weaponizing uranium and developing
plutonium.

The only possible reason the Chinese Communist Party and its Stalinist ally
would be truthful in this agreement is the fact that so much aid is on the
line—Communists tend to be more honest with each other when it comes to
stealing other people’s money. Unfortunately, that honesty never includes
the victims themselves—in this case, the U.S., South Korea, and Japan.

Besides, what consequences will the Stalinists and Communists suffer if the
deal is broken? All Kim Jong-il has seen since he broke the 1994 deal is
more concessions at the bargaining table. Some will argue that he also lost
a continuing supply of fuel oil. However, South Korea just made up for that
with its electricity offer. Does anyone really expect Roh Moo-hyun to shut
off the power once the Stalinists are caught cheating again? He has already
made a slew of bilateral side deals with the regime, and his Uri Party has
an enormous stake in his “sunshine” policy. Odds are, he’ll find some reason
to keep the power on, and Kim, his Stalinist minions, and his Communist
Chinese allies know it.

So what we can expect is either a badly overhyped deal with phantom promises
by the Stalinists in exchange for real concessions from the U.S. et al, or a
promise for more talks in this new “conciliatory” atmosphere, giving Kim
Jong-il more time to hide the nuclear weapons he has, win more side-deals
from the South, and play “bad cop” to the Chinese Communist Party’s “good
cop.” Either way, the Chinese Communist Party will reap immense geopolitical
capital – as the midwife of a deal, or the beleaguered host trying to bring
the U.S. and Stalinist North Korea to an agreement. The recent heartburn in
Washington over Unocal, the Communist military, and Taiwan will be washed
away with good feeling or sympathy regarding these talks.

In other words, be afraid, be very afraid.

D.J. McGuire is President and Co-Founder of the China e-Lobby, and the
author of Dragon in the Dark: How and Why Communist China Helps Our Enemies
in the War on Terror http://www.dragoninthedark.com

(and the Leftists are Silent)

Mendacity in Beijing
By Lt. Col. Gordon Cucullu

In a Freedom House sponsored conference in Washington, DC two weeks ago,
Rabbi Abraham Cooper, Deputy Director of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los
Angeles, strode to the podium carrying an empty chair. He placed the chair
down firmly and declared that it was the symbolic seat for the "seventh
participant at the Six Party talks, the voiceless people of North Korea." At
the first formal meeting of the Six Party talks in more than a year, held on
July 26 in Beijing, the participants not only ignored the chair, they tipped
it over. In a display of cynical cruelty both American and South Korea
diplomats - who supposedly have the moral foundation and fortitude needed to
stand up for the downtrodden - not only disregarded the wellbeing of the
starving, imprisoned people of North Korea but had the audacity to behave as
if the meeting was a huge success.

Stunningly, any reference to human rights was intentionally kept off the
agenda, but even worse, the South Korean representative, Deputy Foreign
Minister Song Min Soon, had the gall to lay down the law to Japan. The
Japanese people have been especially upset about North Korean admissions
that its agents have kidnapped scores - perhaps hundreds - of innocent
civilians from Japan over the past few decades. Many of the abductees are
women and children who are used to train North Korean agents. These agents
are either dispatched to conduct espionage within Japan or are used in
active terrorist operations and fall back on a Japanese "cover" if
apprehended. This issue has raised such a firestorm within Japan that Prime
Minister Junichiro Koizumi refused to eat with Kim Jong Il at their last
meeting, and instead brought his own food as a protest against the
intransigence of the North Korean regime.

So for a South Korean foreign ministry official to warn Japan that "it would
definitely not be desirable to take up issues that would disintegrate the
focus of the talks," was an arrogant statement that reaffirmed what analysts
suspected all along: that strategic weapons issues and economics would once
again overrule human rights in the mendacious atmosphere of the Six Party
talks. Naturally the US representative, Assistant Secretary of State
Christopher Hill, went along with the flow. All of his comments dealt with
delusional "progress." Tellingly, Hill abjectly conceded the initiative to
the North when he said "we do not have the option of walking away from this
problem [of North Korean nuclear disarmament]."

Not that America has ever had the initiative in these talks. For years Kim
Jong Il has been yanking the US chain harder than a model in a Bow Flex
commercial. US representatives to the Six Party talks make public
pronouncements as if they are in control. But whenever Kim Jong Il is
pressured and needs to delay, he feigns a fit of pique and boycotts the
talks. If his hollow economy squeezes too hard and he needs some material
support he grandiosely announces he will attend "in return for security
concessions by the imperialists." US officials waffle like a sine wave in
reaction to Kim's calculated mood swings. They cling to the delusion that
while Kim turns the crank on the organ, and they beg pennies with a cup,
that somehow the monkey is in control of the operation. What is
extraordinarily reprehensible is the State Department's inability to do what
it is supposed to do best: control diplomatic negotiations.

Meanwhile, the bureaucracy disregards explicit policy guidance. Late last
year both houses of Congress unanimously passed the North Korean Human
Rights Act. It was immediately signed into law by President Bush. The law
demands that in all dealings with the North Koreans that human rights for
the long-suffering people of North Korea be placed on the table for
discussion along with any other issues, nuclear, chemical, or missile. This
is not mere policy or guidance - either of which would demand obedience from
a loyal staff - but is the law of the land, duly filed and recorded.

The flagrant, offhanded disregard for this law is stunning but not unusual.
Readers know that I am consistently critical of the State Department
(closely followed by the CIA and FBI) as being the most dysfunctional of all
Executive Branch agencies. Officer selection is anachronistic, training is
incestuous, arrogance is consummate, and the union flies top cover for all
FSOs deflecting criticism and threats of dismissal. Nevertheless, a great
deal of responsibility for the behavior of the middle managers lies with a
leadership failure at the top, at the levels appointed by the President.
This includes, to my acute disappointment, Secretary Rice and her appointed
staff. To be fair it is terribly difficult to be a cabinet secretary and
conduct a top-to-bottom house cleaning of such a key department.
Nevertheless, someone must eventually say that enough is enough and take on
the challenge for reform.

Meanwhile, those of us who read reports that North Korean people have had
their meager government food ration cut to 200 g daily (520 g is the world
standard for survival), while well-fed diplomats preen around conference
tables and pose for grip-and-grin photo ops, grind our teeth in frustration.
As long as the Six Party talks continue on a flawed policy of separation of
strategic arms discussion from human rights issues - which are catastrophic
in North Korea - then the outcome of the talks is predestined to failure.
Such luminaries as Natan Sharansky, who has through his own experience seen
what happens in such a case, call for a gathering of nations to produce a
policy similar to the Helsinki Accords that linked human rights to strategic
issues and in so doing finally brought about freedom for Eastern Europe and
the collapse of the Soviet Union. Such an accord would be incredibly more
productive that the current failed Six Party talks and would recognize our
moral responsibility to free the people of North Korea.

Lt. Col. Gordon Cucullu has been an Army Green Beret lieutenant colonel, as
well as a writer, popular speaker, business executive and farmer. His most
recent book is Separated at Birth, about North and South Korea.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...e.asp?ID=18928

We send North Korea millions of tons of Rice and other (did I say Rice?
bush and Condileeza Rice,naughty,naughty!) (barbara bush is doing the
nasty with another guy too,naughty,naughty,barbara bush) (but,I defer)
kinds of aid and they are still starving to death.We sent Vietnam tons
and tons of Rice too,white bleached all of the nutrients out of the
Rice,white Rice.It was one of our sekert weapons.
cuhulin

Bub,you went out and got a new Seeing Eye Dog,didn't you? My dog
Blueberry www.cattledog.com is sleeping upside down on her! couch
with her two front legs stuck up in the air,one of her front legs is
braced agains't the back rest of her! couch.
cuhulin

I like them words such as stunningly,interestingly,funningly,,,,,, But
that phrase them brits use,It has emerged,they can shove that up their
a.....es sideways! I HATE brits!!!
cuhulin

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:10:59 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog"
wrote:
Give up. It's over.

Enjoy every minute like it's your last.

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:31:04 -0500, wrote:

We send North Korea millions of tons of Rice and other (did I say Rice?
bush and Condileeza Rice,naughty,naughty!) (barbara bush is doing the
nasty with another guy too,naughty,naughty,barbara bush) (but,I defer)
kinds of aid and they are still starving to death.We sent Vietnam tons
and tons of Rice too,white bleached all of the nutrients out of the
Rice,white Rice.It was one of our sekert weapons.
cuhulin

And they returned the favor by sending thousands of Fentanyl (aka
China White) addicts back.

Well,I have done the naughty,naughty with some Chinese girls before many
years ago and they were OK.
cuhulin

For only a dollar,can't beat that.And Vietnamese and Japanese and
Cambodian and Laos.
cuhulin

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:40:06 -0500, wrote:

For only a dollar,can't beat that.And Vietnamese and Japanese and
Cambodian and Laos.
cuhulin

And killer green snot coming outta your dick for 6 months afterwards.