Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 20:46:46 +0100, "Mike Terry"
wrote: Why are there so few on topic postings on this newsgroup? Is shortwave dying like stamp collecting and other hobbies of the past? When I got into shortwave listeniing around 1973, it wasn't popular then. People around me preferred a solid 24/7 AM or FM signal to the fading in and out of SW and formats that were just a general 1-3 hour service. SW was added as an after thought to most cheap portables. Telescopic antennas and dial slider tuning that would whisk past 6 bands in one sweep. Anyone really into the hobby wanted a longwire and a "serious" $150+ rig, something anyone in any country saturated with AM/FM stations of any format did not care for. While it may have popular in the 1930s to 1960s, magazines like Popular Electronics started dropping their SW columns as the computing hobby gained steam. The growth of the Internet has cut into SWBC. Most can stream their signals to such users and they want to leave SW to outlying regions that still use it as a means of contact. Times just change. SWBC is not going away completely, just as newspapers won't. Gene |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"Shortwave is actually experiencing a resurgence" | Shortwave | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Shortwave Listener (SWL) Frequency & Schedule Resources that are available "OnLine" { Links / URLS } | Shortwave | |||
Shortwave Listener (SWL) Frequency & Schedule Resources that are available "OnLine" { Links / URLS } | Shortwave | |||
I wonder... | Shortwave |