Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"FDR" wrote Once we invade somewhere, we tend to stay. 60 years later and we are still in Germany and Japan. How so? Please explain to all of us how the U.S. is "occupying" two democratic nations. Please be specific and quote legitimate sources. I have plenty of time. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 04:34:07 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog"
wrote: "David" wrote They went to war to stop Saddam from selling the oil. and to stop the U.N. Oil-for-Fraud program. That program was ending. Saddam was going to open the gates. BTW: The USA's hands are very dirty in your aforementioned program. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 05:07:04 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog"
wrote: You're weird. Bush stole both elections. If this ain't fascism, I'm a monkey's uncle. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
David wrote: On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 05:07:04 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog" wrote: You're weird. Bush stole both elections. If this ain't fascism, I'm a monkey's uncle. Yeah, you're a monkeys uncle allright and a 'tard boy as well! dxAce Michigan USA |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Chromium,Chrome.Africa and Russia.Vital? You bet your boots it
is,Chromium,Chrome is vital to America and if things lead to War so America can continue to have Chromium,Chrome,So Be It! cuhulin |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"David" wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 04:34:07 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog" wrote: "David" wrote They went to war to stop Saddam from selling the oil. and to stop the U.N. Oil-for-Fraud program. That program was ending. Saddam was going to open the gates. LOL - your not weird, your delusional BTW: The USA's hands are very dirty in your aforementioned program. And is the only nation to have begun prosecution procedures against those involved U.S. individuals. You even decided to omit the fact, like usual, that the most blatant violations occurred under Impeached "c"lintoon's watch. Of course your propaganda bureau chief wouldn't allow you to mention that nicely concealed fact now would they? Weird, indeed. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 09:11:16 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog"
wrote: "David" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 04:34:07 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog" wrote: "David" wrote They went to war to stop Saddam from selling the oil. and to stop the U.N. Oil-for-Fraud program. That program was ending. Saddam was going to open the gates. LOL - your not weird, your delusional BTW: The USA's hands are very dirty in your aforementioned program. And is the only nation to have begun prosecution procedures against those involved U.S. individuals. You even decided to omit the fact, like usual, that the most blatant violations occurred under Impeached "c"lintoon's watch. Of course your propaganda bureau chief wouldn't allow you to mention that nicely concealed fact now would they? Weird, indeed. I'm no fan of Clinton. But he was a lot less dangerous than the current bunch of lunatics. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
SeeingEyeDog wrote:
I hope that just once naive Americans would have a taste of what it would be like if our enemies had control of a vital strategic U.S. resource. Sorry but the 70's oil embargo was just not severe enough. Besides, it was such a long time ago that the current crop of college boys haven't a clue. I am fed up with your Great Game bull****. You see everything as a Big Contest between America and China. Us good, them bad. Everything and everybody can be sacrificed so that Us can win. Uzbekistan? Iraq? Who cares? As long as we control the resources those countries contain and not China, the people who actually LIVE there can go to hell, for they are expendable pawns in the Game. A nuke in New York? So what, as long as we invade Iran because of it, and grab their oil so that China can't. New Yorkers and Iranians are pawns in the Game too, and they might as well be cardboard cutouts, because infinite numbers of them can be burned in the furnace of imperial ambition. You are not only psychotic, you are EVIL. You have implied that regime change in China is worth any price, even a nuclear war, even as you savage CCP nomenklatura for saying the same thing about America. This sort of thing led to the ruin of many countries during the Cold War, and almost led to a nuclear holocaust. All in the name of the Game, all so that one side could stand on the rubble of the world and say that they won. I don't want that to happen again. "Carter-K8VT" wrote in message ... yachtboy! wrote: why are we in Iraq? Good question...and Brad gave a good answer: You are in Iraq because the American Military had lost Osama and Bush had to divert the attention and anger of the American people and make it look like he was doing something about it. You are in Iraq because War is good for business. You are in Iraq because there was a recession in America. You are in Iraq because two days after Bush sent in the troops he announced a $3.6 trillion dollar rescue package for the American economy. You are in Iraq so that American businesses can rebuild the country and spend some of that $3.6 trillion and pay it to American workers and shareholders. You are in Iraq so that American businesses can supply guns, tanks, hummers, radios, uniforms, aircraft, buildings, food, helmets and 6ft wooden boxes and restock using some of that $3.6 trillion. You are in Iraq because War is good for business. Well stated, Brad! Read General Smedley Butler's book (circa 1940) and you will see just how right that last statement of yours really is... Also, if you read "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" by John Perkins (recently on the Best Seller lists for months), his answer to yachtboy's question about "Why Iraq" is: 1) A great strategic location in the Middle East; easy access to the Arabian Sea and many Middle Eastern countries of interest. (No doubt why we are building 3 or 4 permanent bases there). 2) Oil reserves some say are as great as those in Saudi Arabia. 3) Between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, the largest amount of fresh water in the Middle East. Many have asked why we have no exit policy for Iraq. Uh, with all the economic and geopolitical reasons given above, I don't think our gummint wants to exit. I guess "we the people" had a chance to decide if the above strategy was worth the maiming and death of our youth and countless innocent civilians. Looks like 51% went along with the plan... P.S. As Perkins points out in "Confessions", maybe, just maybe, the Islamist world isn't mad at us because of our "life style", but rather that they are tired of us jerking them around, our tinkering in their politics and having to dance to our tune. (Again, before you turn your flame throwers on, give "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" a quick read). Or better yet, have W loan you his Bible and read about "walking a mile in the other man's shoes". Imagine yourself for a moment as the citizen of another country. For decades the CIA has been tinkering with your politics, bribing officials, arranging assassinations and fixing elections. After *decades* of this, mightn't *you* finally get a little ****ed off? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
-=jd=- wrote:
On Fri 12 Aug 2005 04:49:04p, yachtboy! wrote in message : On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:15:25 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: On Fri 12 Aug 2005 03:07:25p, yachtboy! wrote in message : If there weren't any wmd in Iraq, and it was ossama who masterminded 9/11, why are we in Iraq? I would be interested in details, not RNC talking points. Think about it... Let's start at a high level and see if you can reason it to a logical, strategic conclusion. You want to combat and curtail radical islamic terrorism (at least) to a tolerable level. How are you going to accomplish that? Let's see if you can come up with anything other than DNC talking points... That means you will likely have to use a bit of common sense and substantive logic, rather than emotional, symbolic, vitriolic rhetoric. -=jd=- So the leader of our country lies to the people to get them involved in a war that is an extreme case of "the end justifies the means"? So you are choosing to stick to the DNC talking points then? I should have expected as much... Ok, now let's answer the question. We need to fight them on their own turf. You can't fight them militarily and win, as Iraq has proved. You can't go around invading countries, cause either they move next door (as in Afghanistan, they moved to Pakistan) or they run circles around our bureaucratic military (Iraq). We need better propaganda. We need to fire Pattiz and return the VOA to its Cold War self, except in Arabic and Middle Eastern languages instead of Russian. We need a Radio Free Islam. We need an effective satellite news service, not Al Houri (very lame and obvious) but something that looks and sounds reasonable to the average Arab, sort of a black clandestine Al Jazeera. We need to convince the average Saudi that American democracy is better than Arab totalitarianism. If we lose the House of Saud or Hosni Mubarak in the process, so what, we just ally ourselves with the new leaders. We need Radio Free Islam to broadcast sermons by liberal imams that use the Quran to say that suicide bombing is wrong and that liberal democracy and freedom for both men and women is right. We need RFI to broadcast prayers for peace and freedom, to compete with the Saudi shortwave service. If I can figure this out, why can't Bush? Bush seems to be snakebit in everything he does-it's either ineffective or backfires. He's so cocooned in his hermetically sealed world of privilege and power, and the CIA is so entrenched in bureaucracy, that they can't concieve of how to really win this war except to turn America into a New Rome that will crush everybody, domestic and foreign, who opposes them. That simply won't work. Rome eventually was overrun by barbarians, and the New Rome doesn't have much of a chance to get off the ground. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
We are paying for every drop of oil that comes from other Countries and
we are paying (from directly out of our pockets or credit cards/debit cards and taxes) for that oil and every drop of oil that comes from within U.S.A.and offshore.How much is the price of regular gasoline per gallon where you live.If you you want to check the price of gasoline where I live, www.jacksongasprices.com cuhulin |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|