On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 14:30:12 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:



This *ILLUSION* you mention has not resulted in another major terrorist
attack on US soil since the WTC attack. Despite our removing two *ENTIRE*
islamic regimes that were sympathetic to the terrorists; Despite putting
hundreds of thousands of infidels on sacred islamic soil; Despite forcing
the terrorists into coming to us and teraing up *THEIR* neighborhood, I'd
have to say that's a darn solid "ILLUSION" of security so far. Besides, the
Brazilian was positively identified "by a committee" of two or more
decision makers. Although that one isolated incident resulted in a tragic
mistake, I don't know how to make that process more effective without
leaving yourself utterly defenseless. But then again, you perceive self-
defense as an affront to your liberty. But, hey!! If we're only talking
about *your* personal liberty, and it appears we are since the majority
disagrees with you, then I say the majority opinion (which accepts self-
defense as both reasonable and prudent) should rightfully take precedence!

-=jd=-
You are coming from a very emotional, faith-based perspective and it
is really pointless to talk to you.

Personally, my gut tells me that the Bush people enjoy this kind of
anarchy because it helps them rake in the cash.

If you are willing to give up freedom for safety you are a traitor and
a coward.

"David" wrote
Personally, my gut tells me that the Bush people enjoy this kind of
anarchy because it helps them rake in the cash.

What the Bush 101st Keyboard Chickenhawks espouse is hardly *anarchy*.
Go look it up www.m-w.com before you use it improperly again.

If you are willing to give up freedom for safety you are a traitor and
a coward.

A coward dies a thousand times.....

On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 16:49:44 GMT, "Don"
wrote:


"David" wrote
Personally, my gut tells me that the Bush people enjoy this kind of
anarchy because it helps them rake in the cash.


b : a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of
governmental authority

People on the Left accuse Bush of having no plan for Iraq after
''shock and awe''. I disagree. I think they wanted exactly what is
happening, complete with our fighting forces being used like a
toreador's cape.

"David" wrote
"Don" wrote:

"David" wrote
Personally, my gut tells me that the Bush people enjoy this kind of
anarchy because it helps them rake in the cash.

b : a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of
governmental authority

People on the Left accuse Bush of having no plan for Iraq after
''shock and awe''. I disagree. I think they wanted exactly what is
happening, complete with our fighting forces being used like a
toreador's cape.

Here, lets try *1a* first:
1 a : absence of government

Now, where is all this *anarchy* you speak of?