Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 24th 05, 04:05 AM
Al Klein
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 23 Sep 2005 17:29:11 -0700, "N9OGL" said in
rec.radio.scanner:

my view is that all who cause interference should pay.


The FCC doesn't share your view.
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 24th 05, 08:03 AM
Cmdr Buzz Corey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Al Klein wrote:
On 23 Sep 2005 17:29:11 -0700, "N9OGL" said in
rec.radio.scanner:


my view is that all who cause interference should pay.



The FCC doesn't share your view.



And it's the FCC's view that counts, toddyboys view doesn't count for
anything.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME Maritime Phone Patcher General 105 September 30th 05 04:17 PM
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME Maritime Phone Patcher Policy 105 September 30th 05 04:17 PM
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME Maritime Phone Patcher Scanner 104 September 30th 05 04:17 PM
SW broadcaster at 3965, should it be there? Robert Casey Policy 1 October 3rd 04 11:31 AM
Parody of a SW broadcaster Al Patrick Shortwave 0 July 31st 03 05:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017