They were slaves before they left Africa.They were sold into slavery in
Africa.
cuhulin

No such language as the English language either.It is a *******ized
version of the Latin language.Actually,there are no such things as
words.Words are chopped up pieces of sentences.
cuhulin

People and tourist in London see the "official" changing of the guard
and other "official" things about the "official british monarchy" and
they think! they know something about the british monarchy.The real
british monarchy they don't know about is the Jewish british
monarchy.There is another "City of London" in London and even the queen
MUST curtsy there and she has no power or say so about anything in that
"City of London" in London.
cuhulin

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:46:08 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 09:56:06 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:13:08 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:


"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in
message
...
U-Know-Who wrote:
Well, if you ignore their cooking...
--

Now really, how creative can you get with horsemeat, potatoes, and
cabbage?



Horsemeat.... I thought at first glance you'd written "horse****".
You
wouldn't
have been far off if you had.



Ha haa hahahahaa aha pot and kettles with black included mate. Every
country
knows the truth with that one, i wont push it further..


English five-star hotel -- one with French cooks.

Id say American 5 star hotel, with a Fatty Arbuckles or McDonalds
franchise



but you already know that...

Best you can do for a smiug-**** reply?

If we'd let the Germans have you in WWII, you'd at least have
a marginally better "cuisine" right now.

You do sprawl some absolute drivel. Id get out a bit more if i was you....



Your ass was on the block and you damned well know it. As does
everyone else.

Sprawl??? Some kind of homespun limey longo? You should just
get out. Permanently.

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:52:15 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 09:59:13 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:


wrote in message
news On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:11:01 GMT, "U-Know-Who"
wrote:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 18...
On Thu 08 Sep 2005 06:14:23p, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN"
wrote in message
:

The Magnum wrote:
I think you will find your ancestors are english, unless your a
red
indian you halfwit. Or a Peurto Rican scumbag. The people who came
into
contact with The British Empire learnt "well some of you did" how
to
become civilised. If it wasnt for the Likes of the British Empire
you
would be running round in animalskin pants with a spear and live
in a
mud hut.... so blow it out your ass chummy.........


You guys are civilized now? When did that happen?

I really need to get out more....


Well, if you ignore their cooking...

-=jd=-
--

Now really, how creative can you get with horsemeat, potatoes, and
cabbage?


Put enough curry in it and you can gag it down. Some people
forget which way civilization lowed in this regard.

So come on then mr food critic, give us an insight into what you eat then
which puts you in a position to criticise or even to know what your
typing
about... and what do you mean by civilisation lowed in this regard... its
a
bit of a strange statement...


Flowed, jerkoff. You have no gift for context. You're simply
unwilling to admit the only thing to recommend eating in England is
that which you were given by those you subjugated, natve English
"cuisine" is pasty crap.

Well given the standard of your spelling how are we supposed to know what
you are on about. And as for gift of context the utter drivel you spout is
quite amusing. It also lets others know you are quite immature and dont know
an awful lot. If I was to get down to the same level as you I would say all
you americans eat are donuts, turkey and mcdonalds..... thats the steriotype
which i know not to be true... now you need to realise what you know is
untrue too...


Lessee, spelling -- donuts mcdonalds i -- you have a lot to
criticize with. But since you think you'd have kicked German ass
alone, maybe you're better off caviling about spelling since you have
nothing substantive to argue with.

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:07:24 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:37:40 +0100, "The Magnum Dickum"
wrote:


"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...
The Magnum wrote:

Americans enslaved blacks and nearly wiped out the Native Americans
because
they wanted to take the land... the wars with the north and south,
confederates and yankies were some of the nastiest and uncivilised
conflicts
in your history and you were well established as Americans at that
time
and
was not down to the British Empire.... i dont know where you learned
your
history but wherever it was.. if it was... id sue them (hope that
wasnt
too
cheap a shot)


Actually, different tribes were constantly fighting, and took slaves
when they didn't just kill them. Later, they discovered that they
could
sell or trade their slaves for things that they wanted with the ships
that arrived on the African coast to trade goods. A lot of those ships
were from England, and they took the slaves to other places to sell
them.

--
?

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

So Michael, the point you make here is that the different tribes in
America
were already into slavery and used them to barter with the English for
goods
and suchlike therefore making my point that slavery wasnt a result of the
good old British Colonies... They may have been involved in the
transportation of slaves for profilt but that wasnt the point. The
previous
post said, or tried to imply it was the British Colonies that introduced
slavery where that simply wasnt the case.

Also most of the slaves who ended up in Britain werent treated quite as
badly in comparison although they probably didnt think so at the time.

Anyhows this has lead a little off topic as so many threads do, but its
nice
to actually have a converstaion about things rather than cheap insults.
Thank you..


Read for comprehension -- he said, "ships that arrived on the
African coast". Doesn't sound to NA, does it?

Comprehension is a big word for you to spell correctly,

But I did so successfully, didn't I.

You, in turn, followed up immediately with -- its, isnt, and
didnt (all incorrect) in the following two sentences. So get down off
your pretentious pink horsie before criticizing my orthgraphy. Back
from the dictionary yet, you twit?




its a shame the rest
of it isnt too good... Let me say to you once more The British Empire didnt
bring slavery to America, you managed that by yourself quite sucessfully.
BTW slavery was around in the days long before the "British Empire", slavery
even today is a way of life for many people.

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:13:54 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:


"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...
The Magnum wrote:

So Michael, the point you make here is that the different tribes in
America
were already into slavery and used them to barter with the English for
goods
and suchlike therefore making my point that slavery wasnt a result of
the
good old British Colonies... They may have been involved in the
transportation of slaves for profilt but that wasnt the point. The
previous
post said, or tried to imply it was the British Colonies that introduced
slavery where that simply wasnt the case.

Also most of the slaves who ended up in Britain werent treated quite as
badly in comparison although they probably didnt think so at the time.

Anyhows this has lead a little off topic as so many threads do, but its
nice
to actually have a converstaion about things rather than cheap insults.
Thank you..


The British ships that arrived on the US coast wanted cotton to take
to England. That is where they finally got paid. Then they restocked
the ship with goods for Africa and repeated the cycle. All they had when
they arrived on the shores of the US to trade their cargo was a ship
load of slaves and a few manufactured goods from England. They traded
both of them for cotton.

Only an idiot would mistreat any worker that was doing their best.
After all, if you kill all the help you won't make enough money to live,
will you? And then there were "Indentured servants" who traded a number
of years or labor for passage to the US, and were basically slaves
during that time. Legally they were the property of whoever paid their
way, till their time was up.

I never said I approved of any slavery. On the other hand there were
people of every race who were held in slavery at one time or another
throughout the history of mankind, and this still doesn't make it right
at any time.

--
?

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

Please dont think for one minute i support or ever did support slavery...
because i dont and you know, as well as i that slavery still goes on in many
countrys today, especially some third world countrys but there is also still
a lot of it in the US and to a degree the UK too. I have no problems with
the comments you have made Michael and on the whole i agree with you.
The whole arguement on this thread was someone whit half a brain saying it
was the British Empire that created slavery.. and it simply isnt true. All i
pointed out was that slavery was massive in the US and you even had internal
wars over it so to have a go at the UK over slavery was a bit idiotic.
Cheers...


More illiterate drivel from the looney who finds fit to
criticize the spelling of his betters. Anyone who can't pick out at
least ten spelling, capitalization or grammar errors in this pompous
blowhard's tripe should review the fundamentals.

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:26:31 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:


So who are your ancestors... where did they originate from?


Ireland.


Yes indeed, it explains your attitude... did you hear about the Rioting in
Belfast yesterday BTW...shocking... just animals....


If the Brits and their proxies would just give up their
ill-gotten gains and get the hell out, it would all disappear in a
minute. But no, they have to hang on like a dog with a bone. Grasping
*******s.

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:44:42 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:


Hey, -- Magnum -- that's just a brand of rubber, isn't it?

Is it, titter titter that was so funny....ha ahahaha youll never need
one
as
your just a little pecker.... yawl have a nice day now


You'll need one, you big dickhead.

Yes i am rather well endowed.... nice of you to notice but i dont bat
your
way so kindly keep your eyes off...


You likely don't bat at all.

Which shows really you know nothing about me and are quite an immature name
caller...


You still don't bat.

wrote:
Your ass was on the block and you damned well know it. As does
everyone else.

Sprawl??? Some kind of homespun limey longo? You should just
get out. Permanently.


Oh, yeah... I almost forgot. We want those rifles back... the ones American
civilians provided from their own homes so you could protect yourselves when the
Huns came a'visiting. You never returned them after the war. That's just plain
rude.



--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN

VE