www.devilfinder.com Clarion Ledger bush is a hindrance to business
in Mississippi

About two years ago,there was an article in the Clarion Ledger about
what a hindrance bush is to businesses in Mississippi.I hope all of the
Republicans (I am talking real real Republicans and most Republicans
here in Mississippi are real Republicans,not so-called republicans) in
Mississippi are nowdays distancing themselves from bush and cheney.
The other day,cheney came out of that hole in the ground and kissing up
for bush.It isn't working,cheney,and you might as well know that Right
Now!
cuhulin

From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:33:00 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:48:41 GMT, Greg wrote:

From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:52 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

John Barnard wrote:
The war started with lies

Repeating that lie hasn't made it true yet, and it won't. But just for
entertainment purposes, why not cite us one of those lies?

On Thursday, President Bush claimed that: "Nearly 100,000 fully trained and
equipped Iraqi soldiers, police officers, and other security personnel are
working today." *- President Bush, Press Conference, Sept. 23, 2004

However, the Pentagon said last Monday that of these ³nearly 100,000 fully
trained and equipped Iraqi soldiers² only about 53,000 Iraqi troops have
undergone training.

In addition, Reuters reports that of the nearly 90,000 Iraqis currently in
the police force, only 8,169 have had the full eight-week academy training.
And it will be July 2006 before the administration's new goal of 135,000
fully trained police is met.

Greg


Did you ever stop to think that there were some trained Iraqi soldiers
before the war started? We did not kill them all you know. Do you
think that the Pentagon might have meant that we have only trained
53K?

Nope. I think Bush is cooking the books. Or else he just screwed up.
After all, math is hard work.

Greg

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:44:12 -0500, dxAce
wrote:



wrote:

bush's troubles mount as Republican defections increase.
www.globalnewsmatrix.com

Defections? Heck, just today I read that the head of the NAACP in Orlando
switched to the Republican party.

That's progress!

Now as soon as the rest of Black America realizes that the Liberal/Democrats
really don't have their best interests at heart the better off the rest of us
will be.

dxAce
Michigan
USA




Amen brother!

I think I'm going to head over to the Mexican Resturant and get one of
those 32 oz beers. I'll come back and fire up the SP600 and band
cruise for awhile. Laugh at some of the outrageous tards on the SW
bands like I laugh at them here.



Usenet'Hole List
---------------------------------
chicken little and his mom!,

Al-Qaeda beheaded some Americans.Al-Qaeda does NOT! deserve any mercy at
all! White Phosporus,,, so what! I Say give it to Al-Qaeda again!
cuhulin

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:48:32 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:33:00 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:48:41 GMT, Greg wrote:

From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:52 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

John Barnard wrote:
The war started with lies

Repeating that lie hasn't made it true yet, and it won't. But just for
entertainment purposes, why not cite us one of those lies?

On Thursday, President Bush claimed that: "Nearly 100,000 fully trained and
equipped Iraqi soldiers, police officers, and other security personnel are
working today." *- President Bush, Press Conference, Sept. 23, 2004

However, the Pentagon said last Monday that of these ³nearly 100,000 fully
trained and equipped Iraqi soldiers² only about 53,000 Iraqi troops have
undergone training.

In addition, Reuters reports that of the nearly 90,000 Iraqis currently in
the police force, only 8,169 have had the full eight-week academy training.
And it will be July 2006 before the administration's new goal of 135,000
fully trained police is met.

Greg


Did you ever stop to think that there were some trained Iraqi soldiers
before the war started? We did not kill them all you know. Do you
think that the Pentagon might have meant that we have only trained
53K?

Nope. I think Bush is cooking the books. Or else he just screwed up.
After all, math is hard work.

Greg


Did you try reading about this from more than one source? Me thinks
not. Do some more research. You might finally draw a correct
conclusion. Then again, being the liberal that you are, it's doubtful.




Usenet'Hole List
---------------------------------
chicken little and his mom!,

Yeah, they sure must have the best intelligence.

From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:37:06 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:26:20 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: dxAce
Organization: The Listener at the Gates of Dawn
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:17:42 -0500
Subject: the church of bush



Greg wrote:

From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:52 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

John Barnard wrote:
The war started with lies

Repeating that lie hasn't made it true yet, and it won't. But just for
entertainment purposes, why not cite us one of those lies?

The Associated Press
PANAMA CITY, Panama Nov 7, 2005 ‹ President Bush vigorously defended U.S.
interrogation practices in the war on terror Monday and lobbied against a
congressional drive to outlaw torture.
"There's an enemy that lurks and plots and plans and wants to hurt America
again," Bush said. "So you bet we will aggressively pursue them but we will
do so under the law."
He declared, "We do not torture."

'Tard boy liberals such as yourself would rather give the terrorists some
milk,
cookies and a pat on the head.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Actually, I would prefer to have seen Osama killed or captured and Al Qaeda
destroyed in Afghanistan. But, like you, our commander-in-chief has a small
attention span. As to operating torture camps - isn't that what we're
supposed to be opposed to?

Greg


Actually, I don't think making people pose naked is torture,

Nope, that's just good kids having a little fun, eh? Makes the US really
look good.

liberal media got the attention of all the bleeding heart liberals.

....and the entire world.

It was the only way they had to fight back. They whined about some naked
pictures.

The media should protect us from the ugly truth?

What happened to the Jews at the hands of the Nazis, that
was torture.

You're starting to sound like a bleeding heart liberal. Torture is what
Bush want to legalize. He thinks it would make his job so much easier.
He's wrong, as usual.

Greg

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:18:21 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:37:06 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:26:20 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: dxAce
Organization: The Listener at the Gates of Dawn
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:17:42 -0500
Subject: the church of bush



Greg wrote:

From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:52 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

John Barnard wrote:
The war started with lies

Repeating that lie hasn't made it true yet, and it won't. But just for
entertainment purposes, why not cite us one of those lies?

The Associated Press
PANAMA CITY, Panama Nov 7, 2005 ‹ President Bush vigorously defended U.S.
interrogation practices in the war on terror Monday and lobbied against a
congressional drive to outlaw torture.
"There's an enemy that lurks and plots and plans and wants to hurt America
again," Bush said. "So you bet we will aggressively pursue them but we will
do so under the law."
He declared, "We do not torture."

'Tard boy liberals such as yourself would rather give the terrorists some
milk,
cookies and a pat on the head.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Actually, I would prefer to have seen Osama killed or captured and Al Qaeda
destroyed in Afghanistan. But, like you, our commander-in-chief has a small
attention span. As to operating torture camps - isn't that what we're
supposed to be opposed to?

Greg


Actually, I don't think making people pose naked is torture,

Nope, that's just good kids having a little fun, eh? Makes the US really
look good.

liberal media got the attention of all the bleeding heart liberals.

...and the entire world.

It was the only way they had to fight back. They whined about some naked
pictures.

The media should protect us from the ugly truth?

What happened to the Jews at the hands of the Nazis, that
was torture.

You're starting to sound like a bleeding heart liberal. Torture is what
Bush want to legalize. He thinks it would make his job so much easier.
He's wrong, as usual.

Greg


Do you actually think before you post?





Usenet'Hole List
---------------------------------
chicken little and his mom!,

There are some blacks here in Mississippi whom have switched from
democrat to Republican too.More and more blacks all over America are
switching parties.
cuhulin

From: dxAce
Organization: The Listener at the Gates of Dawn
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:35:56 -0500
Subject: the church of bush



Beerbarrel wrote:

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:17:13 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:03:00 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:46:55 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:52 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

John Barnard wrote:
The war started with lies

Repeating that lie hasn't made it true yet, and it won't. But just for
entertainment purposes, why not cite us one of those lies?

All of this comes just as former Marine Corps General and former CENTCOM
commander Anthony Zinni has begun to speak out about the war in Iraq.
Zinni
is the subject of a multiple page article in the Washington Post in which
he
says "If I'm ever in a position to say what I think is right, I will. . .
.
I don't care what happens to my career."

Zinni is indeed telling it like it is. To quote the Post:

"Iraq is in serious danger of coming apart because of lack of planning,
underestimating the task and buying into a flawed strategy," he says. "The
longer we stubbornly resist admitting the mistakes and not altering our
approach, the harder it will be to pull this chestnut out of the fire."

Apparently the time that Zinni turned against the Bush Administration (he
endorsed Bush in the 2000 election) was when he saw Vice President Dick
Cheney speak to a VFW convention.

"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of
mass destruction," Cheney said. "There is no doubt that he is amassing
them
to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us."

Cheney's certitude bewildered Zinni. As chief of the Central Command,
Zinni
had been immersed in U.S. intelligence about Iraq. He was all too familiar
with the intelligence analysts' doubts about Iraq's programs to acquire
weapons of mass destruction, or WMD. "In my time at Centcom, I watched the
intelligence, and never -- not once -- did it say, 'He has WMD.' "

That's right. Zinni says that "never ‹ not once ‹ did [the intelligence]
say, 'He has WMD.'" It was uncertain. It was always uncertain. Once Cheney
left the stage Zinni was conviced of two things: first, that the Bush
Administration was determined to invade and occupy Iraq. And, second,
"These
guys don't understand what they are getting into."

(http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000781.php

Greg



Why does it always have to be WMD's with you guys? You all seem to
forget the other hundred reasons that we should have kicked his butt!

The subject is Bush's lies. Try to keep up.

Greg

Why don't you just answer the question instead of avoiding it?

Because the Liberal 'tards are fixated on WMD's. I know a fellow here who
manages to
bring up WMD's in every other sentence. It reminds me of a one time friend
with whom
it became impossible to carry on a conversation with because every other
sentence
that came out of his mouth had to do with Y2K and the gloom and doom that was
to
follow.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

That's the longest post I've ever seen from you Drakeman! I

'm really not fixated on WMD's. But Clifto asked for examples of lies from
Bush & company and that's one of the most obvious, and arguably, most
significant. Not that "Saddam has WMD's", honest men still debate what his
WMD capability was. It's the: "there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now
has weapons of mass destruction. "There is no doubt that he is amassing them
to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us." (Cheney)


There was doubt, of course, in the intelligence community. That's the part
that Bush & company didn't share with Congress, or the public.

Greg