| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Carter-K8VT wrote: wrote: DU does not atomize. That was the original thinking. Studies have since shown that DU particles become small enough to become wind borne and have been found up to 25 miles from the impact site. Recent research suggests that the particles of DU when pulverized by such actions a armor impacts are too large to be retained in the human body for any appreciable time and will be rejected. If so, there is little or no danger that DU will build up in a human even with repeated exposures. Also not true. The latest studies *have* found significant amounts of DU retained in humans. This is someting I've been trying to follow. Can you offer a poiner to a study or a sory about it? Failing that, do you know how long between exposure and measuring the DU in the system? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
What's that rto mean?
cuhulin |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't know if it is really an anology to DU Tank rounds/Ammunition,but
I know SABOT Tank rounds create a jet flame like a very hot cutting torch just before they strike the side of a Tank.That creates a hole in the side of the Tank for the round,which is about the same size as a silver dollar,to enter the Tank and cause all kinds of damage.I am not an expert on DU Tank Ammunition and other types of DU Ammunition because that didn't exist when I went to Armor Ammunition School at Fort Knox,Kentucky in 1963.An article says DU Ammunition self sharpens and gets very hot upon impact with whatever.There are vapors created and that stuff gets inside of peoples bodies. cuhulin |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I see you use gmail.
cuhulin |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Depleted Uranium Tank Ammunition sharpens upon impact and also self
ignites (very high heat) causing atomized particles which carry far and wide in the air and that stuff gets into body tissues and body organs and lungs.There are some Depleted Uranium contaminated Tanks in Kansas sitting out in open areas and kids have been playing on those Tanks.I think it was at www.rense.com (scroll down the middle isle at rense.com) where I read an article about that earlier this week. cuhulin |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
www.devilfinder.com What happens upon impact of depleted uranium
tank shells? You should get in touch with Dr.Joyce Riley.She can tell you all about depleted uranium. cuhulin |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote: Carter-K8VT wrote: wrote: DU does not atomize. That was the original thinking. Studies have since shown that DU particles become small enough to become wind borne and have been found up to 25 miles from the impact site. Recent research suggests that the particles of DU when pulverized by such actions a armor impacts are too large to be retained in the human body for any appreciable time and will be rejected. If so, there is little or no danger that DU will build up in a human even with repeated exposures. Also not true. The latest studies *have* found significant amounts of DU retained in humans. This is someting I've been trying to follow. Can you offer a poiner to a study or a sory about it? Failing that, do you know how long between exposure and measuring the DU in the system? This may help with what you want: Biokinetic modeling of uranium in man after injection and ingestion Radiat Environ Biophys. 2005 May;44(1):29-40. Epub 2005 Apr 14 JB |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Barnard wrote:
wrote: Carter-K8VT wrote: wrote: DU does not atomize. That was the original thinking. Studies have since shown that DU particles become small enough to become wind borne and have been found up to 25 miles from the impact site. Recent research suggests that the particles of DU when pulverized by such actions a armor impacts are too large to be retained in the human body for any appreciable time and will be rejected. If so, there is little or no danger that DU will build up in a human even with repeated exposures. Also not true. The latest studies *have* found significant amounts of DU retained in humans. This is someting I've been trying to follow. Can you offer a poiner to a study or a sory about it? Failing that, do you know how long between exposure and measuring the DU in the system? This may help with what you want: Biokinetic modeling of uranium in man after injection and ingestion Radiat Environ Biophys. 2005 May;44(1):29-40. Epub 2005 Apr 14 The original subject was how the DU gets from our bullets buried deep in the sands of the desert to the innards of humans. He wanted to know how long it takes from the bullet hitting the sand to the DU appearing in some humans' innards. You listed an article whose title alone tells us it's not relevant. As simply as I can phrase the question: how does the DU get from the bullet deep in the sand of Iraq to the innards of humans? -- If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Beware of hams planting dis-information... | CB | |||
| FYI: NOAA Lightning Safety Awareness Week | Policy | |||
| GAY PRIDE WEEK VICTORY | General | |||