Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 Dec 2005 08:40:29 -0800, "wavetrapper" wrote:
There may actually be value in going this way. Depends on if the % life improvement exceeds the cost difference of course. One thing to know about lithium....they pretty much provide full power and then crash on you. Alkaline, on the other hand, tends to die gradually. It is harder to know when you are losing power with lithium...however performance holds together better during its life. My devices have battery icons of some kind. I replace my NiMHs at 50%. If the device has 2 positions like my Sony Walkman I replace when the icon shows half a battery. If it's 4 vertical bars like my Zen Nano I change at 2. For my old camera and my Casio TV, I always carry a freshly charged spare set. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NIMH batterys | Shortwave | |||
NIMH batterys | Shortwave | |||
NIMH batterys | Shortwave | |||
NiMH D-battery charger? | Shortwave | |||
Charge NiMH inside VR-120D - here's how | Scanner |