Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Telamon wrote: There is not much mystery to coax shielding. If putting ferrite on the coax is making a difference then you may not have a proper termination on the end. This is fixing a symptom not the problem. Disconnect the antenna on the far end and using very short leads place a 50 ohm resistor in place of the antenna across the coax end. Make sure no conductors are near that resistor like the end of the disconnected antenna. Tune the receiver through the band and you should hear nothing other than the radios birdies and internal noise. Any question here where the noise is coming from disconnect the coax from the radio to see if it is still there. snip -- Telamon Ventura, California --------------------------- Several minor points. Very few receivers has a true 50 Ohm input Z. With exception of active antennas, ver few antennas present a 50 Ohm Z to a coax. Real world experience, several years ago I was hired to design and install a WWV time recovery system. My initial effort used a dipole cut for 10MHz. I uses a 1:1 balun to match the balanced dipole to the unbaanced coax. The receiver was coupled to a dedicated PC ISA card and I had major problems with PC RFI getting back into the antenna. Experimenting with a portable SW receiver showed the PCs RF was going up the shield. With the antenna disconnected, and with or with out a 75 ohm load, I had no RF from the PC gtting into the receiver. This was in late 1986. I was able to use a feritte rod wound with (maybe) ~20 turns and a variable capacitor to resonate the LC to 10MHZ. This showed me that even with a matched antenna, and decent receiver, R2000 (I am prone to using equipment I am familiar with) RFI flowing up the coax could be a source of major interference. I finally went with a homebrew active antenna but I still had to use the 10MHz trap. But even with ~100' of every coax I checked, terminated into the proper Z, with a 1.5:1 matching transformer for the use of 75 ohm coax to feed the receiver, I had some engress from local (within ~10 miles) MW stations getting into through the shield. This lead to my research on "transfer impedence". I still don't have any more "understandable" data on that effect. Lots of math that causes my ears to bleed. Based on my experiences I think that more people have self inflicted RF via their coax then commonly accepted. As John Doty points out, a very good shield RF supression can be gained by simply placing the coax under at least ~12' of soil. If the soil dies out completly, this effectiveness will be degraded. Terry Terry |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David wrote: On 22 Dec 2005 07:11:38 -0800, wrote: As John Doty points out, a very good shield RF supression can be gained by simply placing the coax under at least ~12' of soil. If the soil dies out completly, this effectiveness will be degraded. Terry If I started digging a 12 feet deep trench for the shortwave radio wire they'd have me committed. ---------------- Yea, 12 feet would be interesting. As most readers with half a clue might have suspected I meant ~12 inches. Terry |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
Practically speaking there is not much you can do about the receiver input not being 50 ohms but it should be close enough to terminate the coax to the extent that the the coax would be able to shield properly unless it is a really bad design. So with the coax terminated with a 75 ohm resistor (for a 75 ohm system) instead of the antenna the receiver still picked up a local AM station AND the station was not there if the coax was disconnected from the radio input? Both tests need to pass for you to feel confident that this was a case of the local station making it past the shield. It's possible that the local stations signal could be on the mains making it way into the PC radio. If you are correct about this then it would be a pretty rare situation. Dry ground does not have mobile ions for electric fields to push around thereby absorbing the energy. -- Telamon Ventura, California --------------------------- The MW engress was noted in experiments in 3 diverse locations with several different receivers ranging from a R390, AOR7030+, R2000, and, a R5000. In one location I used also used several ham (Kenwood) general coverage transceivers. And yes the MW signals, with the exception of my home QTH, were only present with the coax connected to the receiver. And even at home the signal level jumped enough to clearly show the engress was fromthe coax. Interestingly a borrowed ~300' spool of TV triax was reeled out and with only the outer shield groudned at both ends, with the inner shield grounded at the receiver end, with the far end groudned or ungrounded, had no engress. The WWV dipole experiment was ~20 years ago and I used a borrowed R5000, a R392 and my trusty R2000. At my home QTH I do get one MW station that is about 3 miles away and I swear they must throw a lobe, they are ND daytime only, right across me. The AOR7030+ would receive this MW station on external 12V without an antenna. Only on internal power, wiht the antenna input terminated, did the AOR reject the bugger. I built a rat wire (1/4" square openings) faraday cage and can get the local MW on my R2000s, my R390 and my DX398. Faraday cages do not offer 100% isolation. It is weak but there. This is with all receivers powered from gell cells and the antenna terminated in a 50 ohm non inductive load. The signal was week, but still there, just barely, but there none the less. I am working on trade to get a ~15 year old HP spectrum analyser that will allow me to measure the real signal strength of various events. I am also working on another trade for tuneable RF voltmeter that measures from 0.1uV and from 10KHZ through ~15MHZ. Not perfect, but at least I should be able to get repeatable numbers. Like I said this whole excercise has made me very interested in "transfer impedence". Science is not magic, but sometimes the rules are arcane enough to look like magic until you get enough info to start making sense. For most applicaton minor coax imperfections shouldn't mater. Unless the local noise floor near the coax is on the order of volts per meter any leakage will be, I think, pretty minor. But when trying to reject strong local noise emitters like PCs VCRs and other QRM any leakage can be problematic. There are days I swear I am going to move to the woods and live in a mud hut to et away from all the EMI crap. Terry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ICOM 735 mods | Homebrew |