Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I think we should give Eton a little credit here. (1) They
fessed up to a problem [they did not do so with the Sat800] and (2) they are offering make the owners whole plus provide a "premium" for the inconvenience. They learned from last time, so that's good. CCRadio owners with the failing display problem would have liked similar treatment. They do have a lot to learn, however, about creating false expectations with those availability dates. They'd be much better to overshoot the date by a lot and then be hero's when the radio becomes available "ahead of time." All those missed dates did become comical. I hope they succeed as a company. Not many sw mfgrs remaining. wrote: Ordinarily I wouldn't blink an eye over something like this. Recalls happen. They're a fact of life for all manufacturers. However, Eton's case is different. How many false production deadlines did they announce to their customers and the general public? Was anyone even able to keep track? If you're going to jerk your customers around in such a brazen way for close to a freaking decade, then quality control had better be A-OK when the product finally reaches the customer. So far as I can tell, Eton doesn't have one whit of respect for its customers, which is also probably why it resorts to silly tricks like E1 to sell more radios to the untutored buyer. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|