MnMikew wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


MnMikew wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


MnMikew wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
You sound like the atypical code snob Steve.

Nothing snobbish about it at all.

Getting rid of the code req. is
the best thing the FCC has done in a long time.

I suppose it is for those who are unwilling to learn it!

You seem to have this idea that no-code hams are somehow "dumber"
that
ones
who know it.

Well yes, too dumb to learn the code, so I guess you are correct.

Having no interest is not the same as being dumb.

Or lazy?

At any rate, if one really wants the ticket 5 WPM shouldn't be a barrier.
The
ONLY barrier to learning 5 WPM is either being dumb or lazy. And the ONLY
folks
who would suggest otherwise are either dumb and/or lazy or are supporters
of the
dumb and/or lazy.

Anything else is simply a lame excuse.

Having code req. is a lame excuse.

Only for those who are unwilling to learn it!

Bottom line, if you want the priveleges, you takes the test (and that pretty
much holds true for anything), you don't get to 'cherry-pick' the particular
things that you feel comfortable with being tested on, or that which YOU feel
YOU have a use for.

You're sounding more and more Liberal with each post!

dxAce
Michigan
USA