Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have done some reading about balun transformers and how I can connect
my existing flat antena cable to 75 ohm cable. However, my questions is this... what if I replace the 30 year old flat cable all the way to the antenna. Will this yield better reception? (It is pretty good as it is.) The exiting flat cable is starting to fall apart at some places. Currently I just have it directly wired to my coax cable (just before it enters the house) with out any type of transformer. The coax is properly grounded (to the circuit breaker box.) So my questions are these: 1. How do I connect the coax directly to the antenna? Or should I? Do I still need a balun transformer? 2. If I need a balun transformer, does anyone know of a heavy duty outdoor one? (Or should I build my own.) 3. Will reception improve? Thanx to all who reply. jg |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
While you are at it, you may wish to replace the antenna as well. If you do
be sure to get one with good UHF reception. Once the US switches to digital TV, I believe in 2009, all TV signals will be in the UHF band. "jg" wrote in message ups.com... I have done some reading about balun transformers and how I can connect my existing flat antena cable to 75 ohm cable. However, my questions is this... what if I replace the 30 year old flat cable all the way to the antenna. Will this yield better reception? (It is pretty good as it is.) The exiting flat cable is starting to fall apart at some places. Currently I just have it directly wired to my coax cable (just before it enters the house) with out any type of transformer. The coax is properly grounded (to the circuit breaker box.) So my questions are these: 1. How do I connect the coax directly to the antenna? Or should I? Do I still need a balun transformer? 2. If I need a balun transformer, does anyone know of a heavy duty outdoor one? (Or should I build my own.) 3. Will reception improve? Thanx to all who reply. jg |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:03:47 GMT, "Jeff" wrote:
While you are at it, you may wish to replace the antenna as well. If you do be sure to get one with good UHF reception. Once the US switches to digital TV, I believe in 2009, all TV signals will be in the UHF band. That's not true. VHF High Band and UHF. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JG,
I agree with everyone here that coax is better but so far noone has mentioned there are two types of coax, 50 ohm and 75 ohm. Make sure that you use the 75 ohm coax. 50 ohm is generally used for communications and you can't tell the difference between the two by the size or thickness of the coax. You can tell by the number stamped on the coax, eg. RG75U, etc. J jg wrote: I have done some reading about balun transformers and how I can connect my existing flat antena cable to 75 ohm cable. However, my questions is this... what if I replace the 30 year old flat cable all the way to the antenna. Will this yield better reception? (It is pretty good as it is.) The exiting flat cable is starting to fall apart at some places. Currently I just have it directly wired to my coax cable (just before it enters the house) with out any type of transformer. The coax is properly grounded (to the circuit breaker box.) So my questions are these: 1. How do I connect the coax directly to the antenna? Or should I? Do I still need a balun transformer? 2. If I need a balun transformer, does anyone know of a heavy duty outdoor one? (Or should I build my own.) 3. Will reception improve? Thanx to all who reply. jg |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 Feb 2006 21:53:31 -0800, "jg" wrote:
I have done some reading about balun transformers and how I can connect my existing flat antena cable to 75 ohm cable. However, my questions is this... what if I replace the 30 year old flat cable all the way to the antenna. Will this yield better reception? Maybe. ![]() (It is pretty good as it is.) The exiting flat cable is starting to fall apart at some places. Currently I just have it directly wired to my coax cable (just before it enters the house) with out any type of transformer. How did you do that? Soldered one wire to the center and the other to the braid? I'm curious, but as others have said, you should redo it, and run straightaway to a tv or a signal splitter, if you want to go to more than one tv. They still sell them for flat lead. I would also pay attention to the way the wire is run now. Flat lead should have stand-offs to keep it away from the pole and the siding, and as someone pointed out, it should be twisted I can imagine that some prior amateur or neat-freak kept the wire untwisted because he thought it looked better. So if they didn't do a good job the last time, your job can be better. (The interference will still try to interfere, but its effect on one part of the flat-lead will be exactly the opposit of its effect on the other part of the wire, so the two effects will cancel each other out. Hence, no interference. This is similar to the reason that wires from burglar alarm sensors use twisted pairs of wires, so that lightening won't generate a voltage spike in the wires that will damage the control panel (or set off the alarm?). The coax is properly grounded (to the circuit breaker box.) So my questions are these: 1. How do I connect the coax directly to the antenna? Or should I? Do I still need a balun transformer? Yes. 2. If I need a balun transformer, does anyone know of a heavy duty outdoor one? (Or should I build my own.) They're not so much heavy duty as they are designed to keep the insides dry, with the rubber cover and all. 3. Will reception improve? Thanx to all who reply. jg Remove NOPSAM to email me. Please let me know if you have posted also. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
How did I connect the twinlead to the coax? I used two cones and
twisted them. Center to one lead, outside to the other lead. This was meant to be a temporary solution (two years ago.) At any rate I have one more question, if I go twinlead all the way from the antenna to the TV (almost to the TV, I'll have to switch over just before cable runs up the wall behind my tv) should I be concerned with grounding? As I explained before, coax is well grounded just before entering crawlspace. Will I need to do the same for twinlead? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanx to all who replied and helped out. I've installed a balun
tranformer at the antenna and I've replaced the entire run with RJ6 coax cable. Picture quality increased drastically on all channels. I've got my antenna pointing 206 degrees yet I can still pick up channels 29 (103 degrees) and 19 (143 degrees.) (My antenna's fault I'm sure.) At any rate the local stations (Sacramento) all come in super clear, so I'll leave it as it is. Thanx again. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "jg" wrote in message oups.com... Thanx to all who replied and helped out. I've installed a balun tranformer at the antenna and I've replaced the entire run with RJ6 coax cable. Picture quality increased drastically on all channels. I've got my antenna pointing 206 degrees yet I can still pick up channels 29 (103 degrees) and 19 (143 degrees.) (My antenna's fault I'm sure.) At any rate the local stations (Sacramento) all come in super clear, so I'll leave it as it is. Thanx again. If you ever get the urge, buy a good long distance antenna and put a rotor on it and see what you get! B |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Confused & Annoyed - My new Antenna does not work - What To Do Next ? | Shortwave | |||
FS: RG-213/U Coax Cable | Antenna | |||
FS: RG-213/U Coax Cable | CB | |||
FS: RG-58C/U Coax Cable, Military quality at very low cost | CB | |||
Coax cable interferance? | Antenna |