On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:38:08 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
"Tom Holden" wrote:

"David" wrote in message
news


Fine I'll answer for him. This is not about short wave and it doesn't
belong in this new group. If I want to read about "other means of
communication" I'll join another news group.

This Newsgroup is about all things radio, DC to Daylight. Read the
original FAQ.

David wrote:

On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:38:08 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
"Tom Holden" wrote:

"David" wrote in message
news


Fine I'll answer for him. This is not about short wave and it doesn't
belong in this new group. If I want to read about "other means of
communication" I'll join another news group.

This Newsgroup is about all things radio, DC to Daylight. Read the
original FAQ.

The satellite crap is NOT radio, you dimwitted, drug addled 'tard. I can realize
a passing mention of it from time to time, but dip****s such as yourself tend to
run it into the ground, along with your other 'revolutionary' drivel.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:54:23 -0500, dxAce
wrote:



The satellite crap is NOT radio, you dimwitted, drug addled 'tard. I can realize
a passing mention of it from time to time, but dip****s such as yourself tend to
run it into the ground, along with your other 'revolutionary' drivel.

It's radio, Sweetheart. Uses transmitters, antennas, request lines
and bumper stickers.

Just because it doesn't conform to your quaint notions don't mean it
ain't real.

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

David wrote:

On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:38:08 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
"Tom Holden" wrote:

"David" wrote in message
news


Fine I'll answer for him. This is not about short wave and it
doesn't belong in this new group. If I want to read about "other
means of communication" I'll join another news group.

This Newsgroup is about all things radio, DC to Daylight. Read the
original FAQ.

The satellite crap is NOT radio, you dimwitted, drug addled 'tard. I
can realize a passing mention of it from time to time, but dip****s
such as yourself tend to run it into the ground, along with your
other 'revolutionary' drivel.

DxAce has it right.

First off I don't read articles posted by people that advocate the over
throw of the USA government so I don't read David.

Second the news group subject matter is AMBCB, FMBCB and shortwave
DXing. The news group is primarily about short wave though. This will
be a huge surprise to some very confused individuals but the FAQ goes on
for pages talking about, get this, short wave. Now I know something
along the lines OF THE NEWS GROUPS NAME just might escape some peoples
attention but that is another story.

If you want to be on topic then post about a DX'ing experience,
antennas, radios, QSL's, your shack and equipment, propagation or
questions about the same.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:28:28 GMT, Telamon
wrote:



DxAce has it right.

First off I don't read articles posted by people that advocate the over
throw of the USA government so I don't read David.

Second the news group subject matter is AMBCB, FMBCB and shortwave
DXing. The news group is primarily about short wave though. This will
be a huge surprise to some very confused individuals but the FAQ goes on
for pages talking about, get this, short wave. Now I know something
along the lines OF THE NEWS GROUPS NAME just might escape some peoples
attention but that is another story.

If you want to be on topic then post about a DX'ing experience,
antennas, radios, QSL's, your shack and equipment, propagation or
questions about the same.

DX Ace is a horse's ass. You are a raving paranoid loony. I have
never advocated anything not specified and codified in the
Constitution. I mean that in a friendly way...

'' What is rec.radio.shortwave for?

As stated above this group was created for USENETers to have a place
to discuss
the radio monitoring hobby. This group is not moderated, however
'serious'
arguments and any kind of flame wars are strongly discouraged. That
is not to
say that genuine disagreement and discussion of differing opinions is
not
welcome. We only ask that you keep the tone friendly, and in the
spirit of
international cooperation upon which the hobby is founded.

This group is intended to be a place where ANY radio monitoring topic
can and
should be discussed. We are happy to hear from posters who listen to
any part
of the radio or microwave spectrum, from DC to daylight. We discuss
topics of
almost any kind, ranging from (but not limited to) shortwave
broadcasting,
DXing small or distant shortwave stations, utility and teletype
monitoring,
military eavesdropping, station schedules, QSLing sw broadcasters,
spectrum
usage, equipment design and modifications, antennas, receiver reviews
and
recommendations, and many more.

Despite what the newsgroup name might imply, we definitely DO NOT
limit
discussions to shortwave only. Any radio-related topics are
welcome.''

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/radio/monitoring/introduction/

David wrote:

On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:28:28 GMT, Telamon
wrote:


DxAce has it right.

First off I don't read articles posted by people that advocate the over
throw of the USA government so I don't read David.

Second the news group subject matter is AMBCB, FMBCB and shortwave
DXing. The news group is primarily about short wave though. This will
be a huge surprise to some very confused individuals but the FAQ goes on
for pages talking about, get this, short wave. Now I know something
along the lines OF THE NEWS GROUPS NAME just might escape some peoples
attention but that is another story.

If you want to be on topic then post about a DX'ing experience,
antennas, radios, QSL's, your shack and equipment, propagation or
questions about the same.

DX Ace is a horse's ass. You are a raving paranoid loony. I have
never advocated anything not specified and codified in the
Constitution. I mean that in a friendly way...

'' What is rec.radio.shortwave for?

As stated above this group was created for USENETers to have a place
to discuss
the radio monitoring hobby. This group is not moderated, however
'serious'
arguments and any kind of flame wars are strongly discouraged. That
is not to
say that genuine disagreement and discussion of differing opinions is
not
welcome. We only ask that you keep the tone friendly, and in the
spirit of
international cooperation upon which the hobby is founded.

This group is intended to be a place where ANY radio monitoring topic
can and
should be discussed. We are happy to hear from posters who listen to
any part
of the radio or microwave spectrum, from DC to daylight. We discuss
topics of
almost any kind, ranging from (but not limited to) shortwave
broadcasting,
DXing small or distant shortwave stations, utility and teletype
monitoring,
military eavesdropping, station schedules, QSLing sw broadcasters,
spectrum
usage, equipment design and modifications, antennas, receiver reviews
and
recommendations, and many more.

Despite what the newsgroup name might imply, we definitely DO NOT
limit
discussions to shortwave only. Any radio-related topics are
welcome.''

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/radio/monitoring/introduction/

I have a feeling they meant terrestrial radio, versus your damn satellite crap,
you mentally retarded dimwit.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

I have a feeling they meant terrestrial radio, versus your damn satellite
crap,
you mentally retarded dimwit.


So if a transmitter is up in the sky, it is not radio any more?

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

I have a feeling they meant terrestrial radio, versus your damn
satellite crap, you mentally retarded dimwit.


So if a transmitter is up in the sky, it is not radio any more?

If you read into the spirit of what was written in the FAQ, it is
obvious they did not mean to include satellite radio. If the FAQ were
written today with Sirius and XM present, I would expect satellite still
not be included. This is clearly a supposition on my part but on the
other side inclusion looks to me to be a greater stretch.

Besides the news group "alt.radio.satellite" directly addresses this
topic and David is already posting to that news group so this is
Trolling plain and simple and not an honest discussion.

Also a perusal of David's posts to "alt.radio.satellite" shows him to be
on topic.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

I have a feeling they meant terrestrial radio, versus your damn satellite
crap,
you mentally retarded dimwit.


So if a transmitter is up in the sky, it is not radio any more?

Once it's up there on a geo-stationary satellite it's not 'radio'. It's
satellite crap. And it's sure as hell not short wave, and it's not medium wave
either.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

www.google.com Robokopp Dixie Land

Yeeeeeee Hawwwww,,,,,,, ride that Dr.Strangelove Atomical Bomb,Slim
Pickens.
cuhulin