On 15 May 2006 19:33:43 -0700, "Somebody Somewhere"
wrote:



Hi Kevin. Glad to see you're still alive and kicking.Time for you to
get back on the air and show 'em what proper voice EQ really sounds
like.

Hey, I got a tape of one of your old ADV broadcasts called "The Ominous
Trend". Quite a prophetic broadcast in light of today's invasion from
Mexico. Nobody can say you didn't warn us !

Voice EQ? What a crock. if you need EQ you don't have a voice.

David wrote:
On 15 May 2006 19:33:43 -0700, "Somebody Somewhere"
wrote:



Hi Kevin. Glad to see you're still alive and kicking.Time for you to
get back on the air and show 'em what proper voice EQ really sounds
like.

Hey, I got a tape of one of your old ADV broadcasts called "The Ominous
Trend". Quite a prophetic broadcast in light of today's invasion from
Mexico. Nobody can say you didn't warn us !

Voice EQ? What a crock. ....

You obviously never heard WB4AIO's great sounding audio. As you well
know, many hams, and every broadcast station uses audio EQ and other
processing techniques to improve voice quality. So, like, what's your
beef?

if you need EQ you don't have a voice.

So how's the brain EQ working out for you?

Somebody Somewhere wrote:
David wrote:
On 15 May 2006 19:33:43 -0700, "Somebody Somewhere"
wrote:



Hi Kevin. Glad to see you're still alive and kicking.Time for you to
get back on the air and show 'em what proper voice EQ really sounds
like.

Hey, I got a tape of one of your old ADV broadcasts called "The Ominous
Trend". Quite a prophetic broadcast in light of today's invasion from
Mexico. Nobody can say you didn't warn us !

Voice EQ? What a crock. ....

You obviously never heard WB4AIO's great sounding audio.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHA No amount of DSP or EQ could change KKKevin's little
girly voice!
We know his testicles have shrunk to the size of b-b's and is a
henpecked little worm.

On 16 May 2006 19:18:30 -0700, "Somebody Somewhere"
wrote:


David wrote:
On 15 May 2006 19:33:43 -0700, "Somebody Somewhere"
wrote:



Hi Kevin. Glad to see you're still alive and kicking.Time for you to
get back on the air and show 'em what proper voice EQ really sounds
like.

Hey, I got a tape of one of your old ADV broadcasts called "The Ominous
Trend". Quite a prophetic broadcast in light of today's invasion from
Mexico. Nobody can say you didn't warn us !

Voice EQ? What a crock. ....

You obviously never heard WB4AIO's great sounding audio. As you well
know, many hams, and every broadcast station uses audio EQ and other
processing techniques to improve voice quality. So, like, what's your
beef?

if you need EQ you don't have a voice.

So how's the brain EQ working out for you?

That's bull****. Many, if not most, broadcast stations use no
equalizers. They cause more problems than they solve. Microphone
choice, technique; studio treatment and dynamics processing are used
to tailor the voice sound.

David wrote:

On 16 May 2006 19:18:30 -0700, "Somebody Somewhere"
wrote:


David wrote:

On 15 May 2006 19:33:43 -0700, "Somebody Somewhere"
wrote:


Hi Kevin. Glad to see you're still alive and kicking.Time for you to
get back on the air and show 'em what proper voice EQ really sounds
like.

Hey, I got a tape of one of your old ADV broadcasts called "The Ominous
Trend". Quite a prophetic broadcast in light of today's invasion from
Mexico. Nobody can say you didn't warn us !


Voice EQ? What a crock. ....

You obviously never heard WB4AIO's great sounding audio. As you well
know, many hams, and every broadcast station uses audio EQ and other
processing techniques to improve voice quality. So, like, what's your
beef?


if you need EQ you don't have a voice.

So how's the brain EQ working out for you?


That's bull****. Many, if not most, broadcast stations use no
equalizers. They cause more problems than they solve. Microphone
choice, technique; studio treatment and dynamics processing are used
to tailor the voice sound.




Your statement is factually incorrect regarding equalization, though
the factors you mentioned certainly do affect sound quality and I do
not disparage them.

All AM stations use _at least_ the required NRSC equalization, and
virtually all broadcast stations, AM, FM, or TV, use multiband audio
processing, which is in itself a kind of adaptive, dynamic equalization.

I just applied those techniques, suitably refined for a narrower
bandwidth, to my amateur radio station, after modifying my gear to
remove the somewhat ham-handed attempts of the manufacturers to
shape the audio.


With all good wishes,



--

Kevin Alfred Strom.

News: http://www.nationalvanguard.org/
The Works of R. P. Oliver: http://www.revilo-oliver.com
Personal site: http://www.kevin-strom.com

On Wed, 17 May 2006 13:51:15 GMT, Kevin Alfred Strom
wrote:


Your statement is factually incorrect regarding equalization, though
the factors you mentioned certainly do affect sound quality and I do
not disparage them.

All AM stations use _at least_ the required NRSC equalization, and
virtually all broadcast stations, AM, FM, or TV, use multiband audio
processing, which is in itself a kind of adaptive, dynamic equalization.

I just applied those techniques, suitably refined for a narrower
bandwidth, to my amateur radio station, after modifying my gear to
remove the somewhat ham-handed attempts of the manufacturers to
shape the audio.


With all good wishes,

There's an NRSC ''Mask'' which is used to keep the sidebands within
limits but no requirement to use any preemphasis, unlike the FM
standards.

David wrote:
wrote:
All AM stations use _at least_ the required NRSC equalization, and
virtually all broadcast stations, AM, FM, or TV, use multiband audio
processing, which is in itself a kind of adaptive, dynamic equalization.

There's an NRSC ''Mask'' which is used to keep the sidebands within
limits but no requirement to use any preemphasis, unlike the FM
standards.

TV standards also require preemphasis IIRC. But you're right about AM.

--
Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics
http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm

Blehhhhhh,,,,, BoolSheet.
cuhulin

Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
David wrote:
That's bull****. Many, if not most, broadcast stations use no
equalizers. They cause more problems than they solve. Microphone
choice, technique; studio treatment and dynamics processing are used
to tailor the voice sound.

Your statement is factually incorrect regarding equalization, though
the factors you mentioned certainly do affect sound quality and I do
not disparage them.

All AM stations use _at least_ the required NRSC equalization, and
virtually all broadcast stations, AM, FM, or TV, use multiband audio
processing, which is in itself a kind of adaptive, dynamic equalization.

And then they compress the hell out of it, and for AM overmodulate the
peaks for CB-style range enhancement.

--
Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics
http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm

Shove your lib,,, Sideways.(I am busy looking at that purty woman Pilot
on this here Radio tv movie,,, Nick Fury: Agent of S.H.I.E.L.D. on the
Fox Movie Channel.Bite me again!
(Bite me!) up your lib arse!!!!
cuhulin