Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brenda Ann" wrote:
"David Eduardo" wrote in message . com... "RHF" wrote in message ups.com... SW, "In addition, the LW band and the "Tropical" part of the SW band should be pressed into service for one or two 500,000 watt national coverage broadcasters - government sponsored (NPR?) " Americans increasingly will not listen to even local AM-quality radio. they certainly would not listen to fady, erratic SW. Glad you have a good grasp on your tiny little world Eduardo.. but a lot of the rest of us belong to a great big world with a lot of other choices besides the ones that the NAB wants to cram down our throats. [...] Brenda Ann, You've shown yourself to be one of the true voices of sanity on this newsgroup, and I do respect your viewpoints on various issues. However, I speak from personal experience when I say that arguing with Eduardo (and his cheerleading section) is about as effective as teaching a horse to sing. We, the radio listening public, are just going to have to wait for the decline of radio brought on by the likes of Eduardo to get serious enough that the bean-counters actually notice the downward trend. I haven't listened to commercial radio in years -- not without trying, mind you, but it is just boring and bland beyond hope. Arbitron will never figure it out, too. After the brilliance of Arbitron was pointed out to me (again and again and again), I finally got asked to participate in one of their surveys. Well, actually, my computer was asked. They just picked random phone number digits and came up with my computer modem line, and weren't actually interested in talking to the owner of that modem when I contacted them about participating in the survey. Well, our local water system's data line was also asked to participate, too. I hate to admit it, but radio as we've known it is finally dying. The bean counters won, radio lost. -- Eric F. Richards, "It’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the purpose of a business is to make money. But the real purpose of a business is to create value. While it’s possible to make money in the short run without creating much value, in the long run it’s unsustainable. Even criminal organizations have to create value for someone." - Steve Pavlina, April 10, 2006 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What planet are you referring to? Here on Earth, shortwave seems to be alive
and well, to me... "Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "Brenda Ann" wrote: "David Eduardo" wrote in message . com... "RHF" wrote in message ups.com... SW, "In addition, the LW band and the "Tropical" part of the SW band should be pressed into service for one or two 500,000 watt national coverage broadcasters - government sponsored (NPR?) " Americans increasingly will not listen to even local AM-quality radio. they certainly would not listen to fady, erratic SW. Glad you have a good grasp on your tiny little world Eduardo.. but a lot of the rest of us belong to a great big world with a lot of other choices besides the ones that the NAB wants to cram down our throats. [...] Brenda Ann, You've shown yourself to be one of the true voices of sanity on this newsgroup, and I do respect your viewpoints on various issues. However, I speak from personal experience when I say that arguing with Eduardo (and his cheerleading section) is about as effective as teaching a horse to sing. We, the radio listening public, are just going to have to wait for the decline of radio brought on by the likes of Eduardo to get serious enough that the bean-counters actually notice the downward trend. I haven't listened to commercial radio in years -- not without trying, mind you, but it is just boring and bland beyond hope. Arbitron will never figure it out, too. After the brilliance of Arbitron was pointed out to me (again and again and again), I finally got asked to participate in one of their surveys. Well, actually, my computer was asked. They just picked random phone number digits and came up with my computer modem line, and weren't actually interested in talking to the owner of that modem when I contacted them about participating in the survey. Well, our local water system's data line was also asked to participate, too. I hate to admit it, but radio as we've known it is finally dying. The bean counters won, radio lost. -- Eric F. Richards, "It's easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the purpose of a business is to make money. But the real purpose of a business is to create value. While it's possible to make money in the short run without creating much value, in the long run it's unsustainable. Even criminal organizations have to create value for someone." - Steve Pavlina, April 10, 2006 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 19 May 2006 15:38:40 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote: "David Eduardo" wrote in message .com... "RHF" wrote in message ups.com... SW, "In addition, the LW band and the "Tropical" part of the SW band should be pressed into service for one or two 500,000 watt national coverage broadcasters - government sponsored (NPR?) " Americans increasingly will not listen to even local AM-quality radio. they certainly would not listen to fady, erratic SW. Glad you have a good grasp on your tiny little world Eduardo.. but a lot of the rest of us belong to a great big world with a lot of other choices besides the ones that the NAB wants to cram down our throats. I don't personally know ANYBODY outside of broadcasting that want's to put up with IBOC, and I know several BE's (and I am one of them) that consider it nothing but a QRM generator, and a major PITA to work with. Not to mention that anyone outside a few mile radius from the transmitter can't hear the digital signal to start with. This is proven by anecdotal evidence of numerous people who have purchased the $300 BA (down from $500) and attempted to use it in their local signal areas. That's simply not true. I get several stations from Mt. Wilson in pristine digital that are unlistenable in FM Stereo. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David" wrote in message ... On Fri, 19 May 2006 15:38:40 +0900, "Brenda Ann" wrote: "David Eduardo" wrote in message y.com... "RHF" wrote in message ups.com... SW, "In addition, the LW band and the "Tropical" part of the SW band should be pressed into service for one or two 500,000 watt national coverage broadcasters - government sponsored (NPR?) " Americans increasingly will not listen to even local AM-quality radio. they certainly would not listen to fady, erratic SW. Glad you have a good grasp on your tiny little world Eduardo.. but a lot of the rest of us belong to a great big world with a lot of other choices besides the ones that the NAB wants to cram down our throats. I don't personally know ANYBODY outside of broadcasting that want's to put up with IBOC, and I know several BE's (and I am one of them) that consider it nothing but a QRM generator, and a major PITA to work with. Not to mention that anyone outside a few mile radius from the transmitter can't hear the digital signal to start with. This is proven by anecdotal evidence of numerous people who have purchased the $300 BA (down from $500) and attempted to use it in their local signal areas. That's simply not true. I get several stations from Mt. Wilson in pristine digital that are unlistenable in FM Stereo. Good for you. That makes one person out of hundreds that I know. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
David wrote: That's simply not true. I get several stations from Mt. Wilson in pristine digital that are unlistenable in FM Stereo. VHF or Medium Wave? IBOC on .54-1.705 MHz just doesn't make sense, technically. Mark Zenier Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And I keep telling you, Brenda, that the radios will eventually improve
and come down in price. I showed you that new Radiosophy model. Much improved over the BA-Recepter HD radio. Things will get cooking once they figure out how to squeeze all the necessary electronics into a radio the size of a cigarette pack. -- Stephanie |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stephanie Weil" wrote in message oups.com... And I keep telling you, Brenda, that the radios will eventually improve and come down in price. I showed you that new Radiosophy model. Much improved over the BA-Recepter HD radio. Things will get cooking once they figure out how to squeeze all the necessary electronics into a radio the size of a cigarette pack. And figure out how to make the HD chip run for more than an hour on a set of batteries. That is the current problem with HD portables and why there are none! the next generation chips are in design, though. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "RHF" wrote in message ups.com... SW, "In addition, the LW band and the "Tropical" part of the SW band should be pressed into service for one or two 500,000 watt national coverage broadcasters - government sponsored (NPR?) " Americans increasingly will not listen to even local AM-quality radio. they certainly would not listen to fady, erratic SW. What an odd post to make in short wave news group??? -- Mr. Short Wave |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() mrshortwave wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "RHF" wrote in message ups.com... SW, "In addition, the LW band and the "Tropical" part of the SW band should be pressed into service for one or two 500,000 watt national coverage broadcasters - government sponsored (NPR?) " Americans increasingly will not listen to even local AM-quality radio. they certainly would not listen to fady, erratic SW. What an odd post to make in short wave news group??? One must bear in mind that David Frackelton Gleason aka Eduardo IS a bit odd. dxAce Michigan USA |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "mrshortwave" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "RHF" wrote in message ups.com... SW, "In addition, the LW band and the "Tropical" part of the SW band should be pressed into service for one or two 500,000 watt national coverage broadcasters - government sponsored (NPR?) " Americans increasingly will not listen to even local AM-quality radio. they certainly would not listen to fady, erratic SW. What an odd post to make in short wave news group??? Why? there has certainly not been a groundswell of new listenership for SW. One of the facts we deal with is the declining number of stations and services. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BROADCASTDB Live Radio : Just Added | Broadcasting | |||
FS:SPEECH PROSCESSOR SP1-A BY CLEAR CHANNEL | Swap | |||
Denver Clear Channel drops Fox Sports for Liberal Talk | Shortwave | |||
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |