Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 19th 06, 01:13 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Eric F. Richards
 
Posts: n/a
Default Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference

"Brenda Ann" wrote:


"David Eduardo" wrote in message
. com...

"RHF" wrote in message
ups.com...
SW,

"In addition, the LW band and the "Tropical" part of the SW band should

be pressed into service for one or two 500,000 watt national coverage
broadcasters - government sponsored (NPR?) "


Americans increasingly will not listen to even local AM-quality radio.
they certainly would not listen to fady, erratic SW.


Glad you have a good grasp on your tiny little world Eduardo.. but a lot of
the rest of us belong to a great big world with a lot of other choices
besides the ones that the NAB wants to cram down our throats. [...]


Brenda Ann,

You've shown yourself to be one of the true voices of sanity on this
newsgroup, and I do respect your viewpoints on various issues.

However, I speak from personal experience when I say that arguing with
Eduardo (and his cheerleading section) is about as effective as
teaching a horse to sing.

We, the radio listening public, are just going to have to wait for the
decline of radio brought on by the likes of Eduardo to get serious
enough that the bean-counters actually notice the downward trend. I
haven't listened to commercial radio in years -- not without trying,
mind you, but it is just boring and bland beyond hope.

Arbitron will never figure it out, too. After the brilliance of
Arbitron was pointed out to me (again and again and again), I finally
got asked to participate in one of their surveys. Well, actually, my
computer was asked. They just picked random phone number digits and
came up with my computer modem line, and weren't actually interested
in talking to the owner of that modem when I contacted them about
participating in the survey. Well, our local water system's data
line was also asked to participate, too.

I hate to admit it, but radio as we've known it is finally dying. The
bean counters won, radio lost.

--
Eric F. Richards,
"It’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the purpose of a
business is to make money. But the real purpose of a business is to
create value. While it’s possible to make money in the short run
without creating much value, in the long run it’s unsustainable.
Even criminal organizations have to create value for someone."
- Steve Pavlina, April 10, 2006
  #2   Report Post  
Old May 19th 06, 03:05 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Jim Hackett
 
Posts: n/a
Default Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference

What planet are you referring to? Here on Earth, shortwave seems to be alive
and well, to me...





"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message
...
"Brenda Ann" wrote:


"David Eduardo" wrote in message
. com...

"RHF" wrote in message
ups.com...
SW,

"In addition, the LW band and the "Tropical" part of the SW band

should

be pressed into service for one or two 500,000 watt national coverage
broadcasters - government sponsored (NPR?) "

Americans increasingly will not listen to even local AM-quality radio.
they certainly would not listen to fady, erratic SW.


Glad you have a good grasp on your tiny little world Eduardo.. but a lot

of
the rest of us belong to a great big world with a lot of other choices
besides the ones that the NAB wants to cram down our throats. [...]


Brenda Ann,

You've shown yourself to be one of the true voices of sanity on this
newsgroup, and I do respect your viewpoints on various issues.

However, I speak from personal experience when I say that arguing with
Eduardo (and his cheerleading section) is about as effective as
teaching a horse to sing.

We, the radio listening public, are just going to have to wait for the
decline of radio brought on by the likes of Eduardo to get serious
enough that the bean-counters actually notice the downward trend. I
haven't listened to commercial radio in years -- not without trying,
mind you, but it is just boring and bland beyond hope.

Arbitron will never figure it out, too. After the brilliance of
Arbitron was pointed out to me (again and again and again), I finally
got asked to participate in one of their surveys. Well, actually, my
computer was asked. They just picked random phone number digits and
came up with my computer modem line, and weren't actually interested
in talking to the owner of that modem when I contacted them about
participating in the survey. Well, our local water system's data
line was also asked to participate, too.

I hate to admit it, but radio as we've known it is finally dying. The
bean counters won, radio lost.

--
Eric F. Richards,
"It's easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the purpose of a
business is to make money. But the real purpose of a business is to
create value. While it's possible to make money in the short run
without creating much value, in the long run it's unsustainable.
Even criminal organizations have to create value for someone."
- Steve Pavlina, April 10, 2006



  #3   Report Post  
Old May 19th 06, 02:00 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference

On Fri, 19 May 2006 15:38:40 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:


"David Eduardo" wrote in message
.com...

"RHF" wrote in message
ups.com...
SW,

"In addition, the LW band and the "Tropical" part of the SW band should

be pressed into service for one or two 500,000 watt national coverage
broadcasters - government sponsored (NPR?) "


Americans increasingly will not listen to even local AM-quality radio.
they certainly would not listen to fady, erratic SW.


Glad you have a good grasp on your tiny little world Eduardo.. but a lot of
the rest of us belong to a great big world with a lot of other choices
besides the ones that the NAB wants to cram down our throats. I don't
personally know ANYBODY outside of broadcasting that want's to put up with
IBOC, and I know several BE's (and I am one of them) that consider it
nothing but a QRM generator, and a major PITA to work with. Not to mention
that anyone outside a few mile radius from the transmitter can't hear the
digital signal to start with. This is proven by anecdotal evidence of
numerous people who have purchased the $300 BA (down from $500) and
attempted to use it in their local signal areas.




That's simply not true. I get several stations from Mt. Wilson in
pristine digital that are unlistenable in FM Stereo.

  #4   Report Post  
Old May 19th 06, 03:13 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Brenda Ann
 
Posts: n/a
Default Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference


"David" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 19 May 2006 15:38:40 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:


"David Eduardo" wrote in message
y.com...

"RHF" wrote in message
ups.com...
SW,

"In addition, the LW band and the "Tropical" part of the SW band should

be pressed into service for one or two 500,000 watt national coverage
broadcasters - government sponsored (NPR?) "

Americans increasingly will not listen to even local AM-quality radio.
they certainly would not listen to fady, erratic SW.


Glad you have a good grasp on your tiny little world Eduardo.. but a lot
of
the rest of us belong to a great big world with a lot of other choices
besides the ones that the NAB wants to cram down our throats. I don't
personally know ANYBODY outside of broadcasting that want's to put up with
IBOC, and I know several BE's (and I am one of them) that consider it
nothing but a QRM generator, and a major PITA to work with. Not to mention
that anyone outside a few mile radius from the transmitter can't hear the
digital signal to start with. This is proven by anecdotal evidence of
numerous people who have purchased the $300 BA (down from $500) and
attempted to use it in their local signal areas.




That's simply not true. I get several stations from Mt. Wilson in
pristine digital that are unlistenable in FM Stereo.


Good for you. That makes one person out of hundreds that I know.


  #5   Report Post  
Old May 19th 06, 04:48 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Mark Zenier
 
Posts: n/a
Default Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference

In article ,
David wrote:
That's simply not true. I get several stations from Mt. Wilson in
pristine digital that are unlistenable in FM Stereo.


VHF or Medium Wave?

IBOC on .54-1.705 MHz just doesn't make sense, technically.

Mark Zenier
Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)



  #6   Report Post  
Old May 25th 06, 06:05 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Stephanie Weil
 
Posts: n/a
Default Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference

And I keep telling you, Brenda, that the radios will eventually improve
and come down in price.

I showed you that new Radiosophy model. Much improved over the
BA-Recepter HD radio.

Things will get cooking once they figure out how to squeeze all the
necessary electronics into a radio the size of a cigarette pack.

--
Stephanie

  #7   Report Post  
Old May 25th 06, 06:52 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
David Eduardo
 
Posts: n/a
Default Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference


"Stephanie Weil" wrote in message
oups.com...
And I keep telling you, Brenda, that the radios will eventually improve
and come down in price.

I showed you that new Radiosophy model. Much improved over the
BA-Recepter HD radio.

Things will get cooking once they figure out how to squeeze all the
necessary electronics into a radio the size of a cigarette pack.


And figure out how to make the HD chip run for more than an hour on a set of
batteries. That is the current problem with HD portables and why there are
none! the next generation chips are in design, though.


  #8   Report Post  
Old May 24th 06, 07:32 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
mrshortwave
 
Posts: n/a
Default Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"RHF" wrote in message
ups.com...
SW,

"In addition, the LW band and the "Tropical" part of the SW band should

be pressed into service for one or two 500,000 watt national coverage
broadcasters - government sponsored (NPR?) "


Americans increasingly will not listen to even local AM-quality radio. they
certainly would not listen to fady, erratic SW.


What an odd post to make in short wave news group???
--
Mr. Short Wave
  #9   Report Post  
Old May 24th 06, 12:35 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference



mrshortwave wrote:

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"RHF" wrote in message
ups.com...
SW,

"In addition, the LW band and the "Tropical" part of the SW band should

be pressed into service for one or two 500,000 watt national coverage
broadcasters - government sponsored (NPR?) "


Americans increasingly will not listen to even local AM-quality radio. they
certainly would not listen to fady, erratic SW.


What an odd post to make in short wave news group???


One must bear in mind that David Frackelton Gleason aka Eduardo IS a bit odd.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #10   Report Post  
Old May 24th 06, 12:42 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
David Eduardo
 
Posts: n/a
Default Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference


"mrshortwave" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"RHF" wrote in message
ups.com...
SW,

"In addition, the LW band and the "Tropical" part of the SW band should

be pressed into service for one or two 500,000 watt national coverage
broadcasters - government sponsored (NPR?) "


Americans increasingly will not listen to even local AM-quality radio.
they
certainly would not listen to fady, erratic SW.


What an odd post to make in short wave news group???


Why? there has certainly not been a groundswell of new listenership for SW.
One of the facts we deal with is the declining number of stations and
services.




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BROADCASTDB Live Radio : Just Added broadcastdb Broadcasting 0 April 7th 05 01:56 AM
FS:SPEECH PROSCESSOR SP1-A BY CLEAR CHANNEL Kb9igg Swap 0 December 12th 04 06:39 PM
Denver Clear Channel drops Fox Sports for Liberal Talk David Shortwave 4 September 1st 04 09:20 AM
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) Jon Noring Shortwave 103 June 30th 04 07:13 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017