Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... David Eduardo wrote: In every market, we have had good HD experiences on AM and FM... NY, Miami, Dallas, Houston, Chicago, Phoenix, LA, San Diego, San Francisco, etc. All our engineers like it, and love the sound. I'm glad your engineers are happy, but I suspect your advertisers are aiming at a slightly larger listening audience. We had our highest total ratings ever in Winter 2006. The advertisers are happy. Our company was awarded the only A+ for ratings performance by an investment firm that tracks radio as an industry. The HD signal exceeds the USABLE Am and FM coutours in every case... unless you are using the Boston Acoustics Receptor, which is a bad HD radio. Unless you have unreasonably high standards for what counts as 'usable', this is simply false. My standard is the contours where listening occurs. there have been plenty of studies of where most listening occurs, and where the drop-off contours are. Most of us have been tracking this sort of stuff since the 70's. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BROADCASTDB Live Radio : Just Added | Broadcasting | |||
FS:SPEECH PROSCESSOR SP1-A BY CLEAR CHANNEL | Swap | |||
Denver Clear Channel drops Fox Sports for Liberal Talk | Shortwave | |||
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |