Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "IonSpot" wrote in message ... IBOC will be just another failed attempt to "save" AM radio. AM radio died decades ago as a viable medium. I see. then why are two of the top 3 billing stations in San Francisco AM? In fact, a quarter of the top 100 billing stations in the USA are AM. In 1985 I was in the industry and at that time CQUAM AM Stereo was gonna save AM Radio. It didn't and IBOC won't. AM swtereo was supposed to launch in 1978. A nasty old man, Leonard Kahn, sued to try to get his system approved, and it was 1983 before a decision was made. By that time, AM had gone form 60% of all listening to 40%, and there was no chance to revive it. Plus, the early C Quam was not a particularly good system, especially in cars. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: "IonSpot" wrote in message ... IBOC will be just another failed attempt to "save" AM radio. AM radio died decades ago as a viable medium. I see. then why are two of the top 3 billing stations in San Francisco AM? In fact, a quarter of the top 100 billing stations in the USA are AM. Without a survey at hand, I assume you are referring to KQED-FM, KGO, and KCBS. The bay area has terrible traffic. There are people who drive with KCBS on the radio all the time. Makes no sense to me as arely does a traffic report save my arse. The same goes for KGO, though at least they have talk also. Due to the terrain of the bay area, AM stations can be heard in more places. [It's not the LA basin.] Only KFOG comes to mind with a SF and south bay simulcast, and the number of boosters is quite small. Most of the San Franciso FMs can't hit the south bay, but the south bay is part of the the SF region in the Arbitron, right. Even KSFO can reach south San Jose. In 1985 I was in the industry and at that time CQUAM AM Stereo was gonna save AM Radio. It didn't and IBOC won't. AM swtereo was supposed to launch in 1978. A nasty old man, Leonard Kahn, sued to try to get his system approved, and it was 1983 before a decision was made. By that time, AM had gone form 60% of all listening to 40%, and there was no chance to revive it. Plus, the early C Quam was not a particularly good system, especially in cars. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... David Eduardo wrote: "IonSpot" wrote in message ... IBOC will be just another failed attempt to "save" AM radio. AM radio died decades ago as a viable medium. I see. then why are two of the top 3 billing stations in San Francisco AM? In fact, a quarter of the top 100 billing stations in the USA are AM. Without a survey at hand, I assume you are referring to KQED-FM, KGO, and KCBS. KQED is not AM, and it does not bill ad revenues (they are non-com). KGO, KCBS and KNBR are top 10 billers (in fact, they ARE the top 3), and KSFO is very close to being top 10. The bay area has terrible traffic. There are people who drive with KCBS on the radio all the time. Makes no sense to me as arely does a traffic report save my arse. The same goes for KGO, though at least they have talk also. In car listening is only 30% of all radio listening in the market. Due to the terrain of the bay area, AM stations can be heard in more places. [It's not the LA basin.] Only KFOG comes to mind with a SF and south bay simulcast, and the number of boosters is quite small. SF is a better than average AM market, but so is Chicago... WSCR, WLS, WGN and WBBM are all top 10 billers. No hills, either. It is about being big signal stations, not about AM vs. FM. Most of the San Franciso FMs can't hit the south bay, but the south bay is part of the the SF region in the Arbitron, right. Even KSFO can reach south San Jose. SF metro is Santa Rosa to Campbell. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: wrote in message oups.com... David Eduardo wrote: "IonSpot" wrote in message ... IBOC will be just another failed attempt to "save" AM radio. AM radio died decades ago as a viable medium. I see. then why are two of the top 3 billing stations in San Francisco AM? In fact, a quarter of the top 100 billing stations in the USA are AM. Without a survey at hand, I assume you are referring to KQED-FM, KGO, and KCBS. KQED is not AM, and it does not bill ad revenues (they are non-com). KGO, KCBS and KNBR are top 10 billers (in fact, they ARE the top 3), and KSFO is very close to being top 10. AH, maybe that's why I said KQED-FM. Anyway, I missed the AM in your original post. The bay area has terrible traffic. There are people who drive with KCBS on the radio all the time. Makes no sense to me as arely does a traffic report save my arse. The same goes for KGO, though at least they have talk also. In car listening is only 30% of all radio listening in the market. Again, you play with stats. What is the in-car listening AM market? After all, it is AM HD everyone on this list wants to stop. It is QRM! Due to the terrain of the bay area, AM stations can be heard in more places. [It's not the LA basin.] Only KFOG comes to mind with a SF and south bay simulcast, and the number of boosters is quite small. SF is a better than average AM market, but so is Chicago... WSCR, WLS, WGN and WBBM are all top 10 billers. No hills, either. It is about being big signal stations, not about AM vs. FM. Most of the San Franciso FMs can't hit the south bay, but the south bay is part of the the SF region in the Arbitron, right. Even KSFO can reach south San Jose. SF metro is Santa Rosa to Campbell. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... David Eduardo wrote: The bay area has terrible traffic. There are people who drive with KCBS on the radio all the time. Makes no sense to me as arely does a traffic report save my arse. The same goes for KGO, though at least they have talk also. In car listening is only 30% of all radio listening in the market. Again, you play with stats. What is the in-car listening AM market? After all, it is AM HD everyone on this list wants to stop. It is QRM! In San Francisco, the AM stations have a 24 share nof in car listening 6 AM to Midnight. In Morning drive, they have a 25.4% share of all persons listening to the radio in the car. So SF is actually below the national average of a 30% share. LA is 31%, NY with lots of public transportaiton, has a 25% share. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BTW Stevie were watch the news lately about NASA | Policy | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
a great read | CB | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | CB |