Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 10th 06, 06:02 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 726
Default This Really Sucks


"dxAce" wrote in message
...

** U S A. Strong rumor from allegedly reliable sources is that the FCC
will be
making an across-the-board authorization for nighttime IBOC on MW within
the
next two weeks. Better enjoy your nighttime MW listening and DXing while
you
can. More and more ``clear`` channel stations have been testing it in the
daytime, and once they all start running it at night, large portions of
the AM
band will be devoted to noise (Glenn Hauser, July 9, DX LISTENING DIGEST)

Thanks to 'Eduardo' and all the other beancounting dip****s out there!


Yep. We are going to try to save AM. It may not be possible, though.


  #2   Report Post  
Old July 10th 06, 06:07 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,243
Default This Really Sucks



David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

** U S A. Strong rumor from allegedly reliable sources is that the FCC
will be
making an across-the-board authorization for nighttime IBOC on MW within
the
next two weeks. Better enjoy your nighttime MW listening and DXing while
you
can. More and more ``clear`` channel stations have been testing it in the
daytime, and once they all start running it at night, large portions of
the AM
band will be devoted to noise (Glenn Hauser, July 9, DX LISTENING DIGEST)

Thanks to 'Eduardo' and all the other beancounting dip****s out there!


Yep. We are going to try to save AM. It may not be possible, though.


Yeah, saving AM through QRM.

Great plan there, Edweenie!

I love it when you use the *WE* shtick. It sounds so, well it sounds so
egotistical!


  #3   Report Post  
Old July 10th 06, 07:40 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 726
Default This Really Sucks


"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

** U S A. Strong rumor from allegedly reliable sources is that the FCC
will be
making an across-the-board authorization for nighttime IBOC on MW
within
the
next two weeks. Better enjoy your nighttime MW listening and DXing
while
you
can. More and more ``clear`` channel stations have been testing it in
the
daytime, and once they all start running it at night, large portions of
the AM
band will be devoted to noise (Glenn Hauser, July 9, DX LISTENING
DIGEST)

Thanks to 'Eduardo' and all the other beancounting dip****s out there!


Yep. We are going to try to save AM. It may not be possible, though.


Yeah, saving AM through QRM.

Great plan there, Edweenie!

I love it when you use the *WE* shtick. It sounds so, well it sounds so
egotistical!


iBiquity is backed by every major broadcast company, right down to companies
like UnoRadio Group in Puerto Rico. That is the "we" I refer to... the
broadcast industry and its leaders.


  #4   Report Post  
Old July 10th 06, 09:24 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,324
Default This Really Sucks


David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

** U S A. Strong rumor from allegedly reliable sources is that the FCC
will be
making an across-the-board authorization for nighttime IBOC on MW
within
the
next two weeks. Better enjoy your nighttime MW listening and DXing
while
you
can. More and more ``clear`` channel stations have been testing it in
the
daytime, and once they all start running it at night, large portions of
the AM
band will be devoted to noise (Glenn Hauser, July 9, DX LISTENING
DIGEST)

Thanks to 'Eduardo' and all the other beancounting dip****s out there!

Yep. We are going to try to save AM. It may not be possible, though.


Yeah, saving AM through QRM.

Great plan there, Edweenie!

I love it when you use the *WE* shtick. It sounds so, well it sounds so
egotistical!


iBiquity is backed by every major broadcast company, right down to companies
like UnoRadio Group in Puerto Rico. That is the "we" I refer to... the
broadcast industry and its leaders.


Thanks, but I'm not looking to buy anything today.

  #5   Report Post  
Old July 10th 06, 09:25 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,324
Default This Really Sucks


David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

** U S A. Strong rumor from allegedly reliable sources is that the FCC
will be
making an across-the-board authorization for nighttime IBOC on MW
within
the
next two weeks. Better enjoy your nighttime MW listening and DXing
while
you
can. More and more ``clear`` channel stations have been testing it in
the
daytime, and once they all start running it at night, large portions of
the AM
band will be devoted to noise (Glenn Hauser, July 9, DX LISTENING
DIGEST)

Thanks to 'Eduardo' and all the other beancounting dip****s out there!

Yep. We are going to try to save AM. It may not be possible, though.


Yeah, saving AM through QRM.

Great plan there, Edweenie!

I love it when you use the *WE* shtick. It sounds so, well it sounds so
egotistical!


iBiquity is backed by every major broadcast company, right down to companies
like UnoRadio Group in Puerto Rico. That is the "we" I refer to... the
broadcast industry and its leaders.


I'm just browsing right now...not looking to buy anything. Thanks.



  #6   Report Post  
Old July 10th 06, 06:41 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 156
Default This Really Sucks


"David Eduardo" wrote in message
. ..


Yep. We are going to try to save AM. It may not be possible, though.



What will happen to AM if it can't be saved?

Frank Dresser


  #7   Report Post  
Old July 10th 06, 06:46 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,243
Default This Really Sucks



Frank Dresser wrote:

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
. ..


Yep. We are going to try to save AM. It may not be possible, though.



What will happen to AM if it can't be saved?


Edweenie and his minions think it will just go *poof*, it's gone.

Edweenie is mistaken.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #8   Report Post  
Old July 10th 06, 07:43 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 726
Default This Really Sucks


"Frank Dresser" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
. ..


Yep. We are going to try to save AM. It may not be possible, though.



What will happen to AM if it can't be saved?


It will slowly die as the existing listeners age and ad revenues decrease.


  #9   Report Post  
Old July 10th 06, 10:27 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 25
Default This Really Sucks


David Eduardo wrote:
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
. ..


Yep. We are going to try to save AM. It may not be possible, though.



What will happen to AM if it can't be saved?


It will slowly die as the existing listeners age and ad revenues decrease.


This guy is unbelievable - what a salesman ! I wonder, if he ever
dabbled in used cars ? Hey bud, we'll see - to try and mandate that
all future AM/FM radios be able to receive/procees IBOC is absurd !
IBOC is going to save AM/FM - what a ****ing joke ! I am sure many
people, including myself, are perfectly happy with AM/FM, as it is; if
anything, new programming formats will "save" the airwaves, not some
crummy new broadcasting transmission technology !

  #10   Report Post  
Old July 11th 06, 07:12 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 317
Default This Really Sucks


David Eduardo wrote:
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
. ..


Yep. We are going to try to save AM. It may not be possible, though.



What will happen to AM if it can't be saved?


It will slowly die as the existing listeners age and ad revenues decrease.


So AM stations become cheaper to buy and thus less corporate influence.
So the problem is?????



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another one of my many site NIM BUSTER SUCKS! N9OGL General 0 January 27th 06 06:16 AM
AKC's gayness AKC Master Control CB 13 May 8th 04 01:52 PM
Tektronix SUCKS!!!!! private CB 0 November 11th 03 04:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017