"Wayne R." wrote:

On 22 Jul 2006 07:16:31 -0700, "RobnzBoy" wrote:

my favotite songs and a week's worth of Rush Limbaugh, and I still have

Please do the world a favor and listen to something besides that
drug-addled nutcase. Pat Robertson doesn't count, either.

We'd be so much better off if even a few ditto-heads thought for
themselves.

I'd wager that there are more drug addled nutcases that listen to Air America
than listen to Rush.

The demographics of the Liberal/Democrats assure this, simply look up who and
what their constituency consists of.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 10:52:26 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



"Wayne R." wrote:

On 22 Jul 2006 07:16:31 -0700, "RobnzBoy" wrote:

my favotite songs and a week's worth of Rush Limbaugh, and I still have

Please do the world a favor and listen to something besides that
drug-addled nutcase. Pat Robertson doesn't count, either.

We'd be so much better off if even a few ditto-heads thought for
themselves.

I'd wager that there are more drug addled nutcases that listen to Air America
than listen to Rush.

I'll bet more alcoholics listen to Rush. Of course, alcohol isn't a
drug :-)

bob
k5qwg



The demographics of the Liberal/Democrats assure this, simply look up who and
what their constituency consists of.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 10:52:26 -0400, dxAce wrote
(with clarity & insight):

I'd wager that there are more drug addled nutcases that listen to Air America
than listen to Rush.

Absolutely. Inarguable. But, in this case, the preacher is the addled
one. And his argument is that *he's* the voice of clear-headedness.

The demographics of the Liberal/Democrats assure this, simply look up who and
what their constituency consists of.

So, go ahead with the next piece of logic: Which came first: the
liberals, the addled-ness or the need to become addled?

I'd say that liberal-mindedness promotes the possibility that
occasional addled-ness isn't a big problem. But living in a world
"run" by the Rove/Rush/Right machine perhaps forces a need for it.

But I could be wrong. I'm open to other interpretations.