Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" wrote in message . ..
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:01:45 GMT, "Brian Denley" wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: Evolution is similar. It's a very sucessful theory that has explained much that was previously unexplained. Even the Pope has admitted it's probable truth. But more is learned all the time. Not by everyone. I think there's a substantive difference between mathematical theories which can be formally proved through logic and scientific theories which are considered valid because they explain observed fact and no facts have yet falsified them. its sometimes said that that all scientific theories are only provisionally valid, although, obviously some of them are very well established. still, its always possible that QM could be falisified tomorrow. confusing these kinds of proofs only plays into the hands of the woowoos who wrongly expect mathematical proof for established theories such as evolution. FYI, the Catholic Church is not against even human evolution. that said, I do not believe edconrad has evolved at all. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|