Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 11th 06, 03:34 PM posted to rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 35
Default Bad Hams !

Is this what happends after folks pass the code test?


Hollingsworth told David O. Castle, WA9KJI, of Evansville, Indiana, October
11 that the WTB referral was the result of "longstanding complaints against
the operation of your station" involving interference on HF and 2 meters. In
another case, Hollingsworth wrote William F. Crowell, W6WBJ (ex-N6AYJ), of
Diamond Springs, California, that his license renewal application has been
designated for hearing after a review of "numerous complaints filed against
the operation of your station" alleging deliberate interference.

Hearings are held in Washington, DC, before an administrative law judge, and
the applicants will have the burden of proof in showing they're still
qualified to be Amateur Radio licensees. Over the past several years, the
FCC has asked both licensees to respond to allegations of deliberate
interference on the amateur bands.


  #2   Report Post  
Old November 11th 06, 03:44 PM posted to rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 41
Default Bad Hams !

"A.E. 352" wrote in
:

Is this what happends after folks pass the code test?


Hollingsworth told David O. Castle, WA9KJI, of Evansville, Indiana,
October 11 that the WTB referral was the result of "longstanding
complaints against the operation of your station" involving interference
on HF and 2 meters. In another case, Hollingsworth wrote William F.
Crowell, W6WBJ (ex-N6AYJ), of Diamond Springs, California, that his
license renewal application has been designated for hearing after a
review of "numerous complaints filed against the operation of your
station" alleging deliberate interference.

Hearings are held in Washington, DC, before an administrative law judge,
and the applicants will have the burden of proof in showing they're
still qualified to be Amateur Radio licensees. Over the past several
years, the FCC has asked both licensees to respond to allegations of
deliberate interference on the amateur bands.




Yep, if you don't play nice with your new shiny license, then you will suffer
the consequences. It happen to the nocoders also since one has nothing to do
with the other. Bad hams are bad hams weither or not they can read morse
code, has nothing to do with it. Of courae you already knew that didn't you
???

PLONK

--
Panzer

  #3   Report Post  
Old November 11th 06, 11:10 PM posted to rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 4
Default Bad ham? NU8F Tim Neff

THIS GUY OWES ME MONEY, ANYONE ELSE HAVE THAT SAME PROBLEM?

WHERE IS TIM THESE DAYS? MAYBE BEHIND BARS I HOPE!


I WANT MY DAMN MONEY., IM CLOSING OUT ALL BAD DEBTS TO ME THIS YEAR OF
2006 NOW!


TIM WE HAVE FOUND YOU!
"A.E. 352" wrote in message
...
Is this what happends after folks pass the code test?


Hollingsworth told David O. Castle, WA9KJI, of Evansville, Indiana,
October
11 that the WTB referral was the result of "longstanding complaints
against
the operation of your station" involving interference on HF and 2 meters.
In
another case, Hollingsworth wrote William F. Crowell, W6WBJ (ex-N6AYJ), of
Diamond Springs, California, that his license renewal application has been
designated for hearing after a review of "numerous complaints filed
against
the operation of your station" alleging deliberate interference.

Hearings are held in Washington, DC, before an administrative law judge,
and
the applicants will have the burden of proof in showing they're still
qualified to be Amateur Radio licensees. Over the past several years, the
FCC has asked both licensees to respond to allegations of deliberate
interference on the amateur bands.



  #4   Report Post  
Old November 12th 06, 01:18 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Bad Hams !

"A.E. 352" wrote in
:

Is this what happends after folks pass the code test?


Hollingsworth told David O. Castle, WA9KJI, of Evansville, Indiana,
October 11 that the WTB referral was the result of "longstanding
complaints against the operation of your station" involving interference
on HF and 2 meters. In another case, Hollingsworth wrote William F.
Crowell, W6WBJ (ex-N6AYJ), of Diamond Springs, California, that his
license renewal application has been designated for hearing after a
review of "numerous complaints filed against the operation of your
station" alleging deliberate interference.



You think that's bad, you should hear the retarded assholes on CB.

SC
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hams ruin welcome at Rose Parade No Roses Policy 16 January 8th 06 09:16 PM
Docket Scorecard [email protected] Policy 108 October 29th 05 12:02 AM
Open Letter to K1MAN [email protected] Policy 13 April 15th 05 07:43 PM
Doug, can you please stop ? Lancer CB 106 October 16th 04 07:39 AM
For HAMS in or near EVERGREEN, COLORADO SecondHandMarklin.com Dx 0 January 6th 04 03:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017