Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:52:55 -0700, Dick
wrote: It seems a little odd for people to get stuffy about 73 vs 73's, when both are designed for Morse CW. If you are speaking, neither is "correct". - Mike KB3EIA - When was the last time you heard 73's sent on CW? Of course I have only been licensed for 52 years, so I will have defer to those more senior than me. Dick - W6CCD It's OK - we didn't ask Mike anyway. He probably doesn't use CW or he would realize that "73" is always used on CW, but on phone it is quite commonly stated as "73s" whether the whiners like it or not! Merry holidays! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateurs Handle Emergency Comms in Wake of Hurricane Ivan | Broadcasting | |||
Amateurs Handle Emergency Comms in Wake of Hurricane Ivan | Shortwave | |||
FT-900 HANDLE | Equipment | |||
Can a 1W resistor handle 50W for 7msec? | Homebrew | |||
Can a 1W resistor handle 50W for 7msec? | Homebrew |