| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
jakdedert wrote: IMHO, requiring a code test is like requiring someone to know how to reupholster their car in order to get a drivers license. It's unlikely that they will ever use the knowledge. OTOH, I've seen a number of very simplistic technical questions posted lately in this and in other forums, by 'hams' who should know better.... jak I think it would be more like knowing how to change a tire to get a drivers license! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| Canada says... "Drop the Code!" | Swap | |||
| My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||