Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
whoever wrote:
jakdedert wrote: IMHO, requiring a code test is like requiring someone to know how to reupholster their car in order to get a drivers license. It's unlikely that they will ever use the knowledge. OTOH, I've seen a number of very simplistic technical questions posted lately in this and in other forums, by 'hams' who should know better.... jak I think it would be more like knowing how to change a tire to get a drivers license! NIMO...in an emergency, one might actually 'have' to change a tire. They'll never HAVE to reupholster the seats. They might 'want' to, and learn how, but I can't imagine it ever being required. If one just learns enough code to pass the test, it's doubtful they'll remember enough to communicate a year later...even in an emergency. jak |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Canada says... "Drop the Code!" | Swap | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |