LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old January 27th 05, 11:15 PM
jakdedert
 
Posts: n/a
Default

whoever wrote:
jakdedert wrote:

IMHO, requiring a code test is like requiring someone to know how to
reupholster their car in order to get a drivers license. It's
unlikely that they will ever use the knowledge.

OTOH, I've seen a number of very simplistic technical questions posted
lately in this and in other forums, by 'hams' who should know
better....

jak



I think it would be more like knowing how to change a tire to get a
drivers license!


NIMO...in an emergency, one might actually 'have' to change a tire. They'll
never HAVE to reupholster the seats. They might 'want' to, and learn how,
but I can't imagine it ever being required.

If one just learns enough code to pass the test, it's doubtful they'll
remember enough to communicate a year later...even in an emergency.

jak




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] RHF Shortwave 0 January 5th 04 02:49 PM
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 03:45 AM
Canada says... "Drop the Code!" Hamguy Swap 1 November 1st 03 10:05 PM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC Brian Policy 3 October 24th 03 12:02 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017