LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Report Post  
Old January 30th 05, 12:30 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Dave VanHorn"
writes:

Despite all the "emergency" arguments, even the coast guard dropped it.


It's a bit more complex than that.

Newer radio systems replaced the need for *radio operators* on ships in the
1990s, and the rules were changed to eliminate the need for maritime CW
capability. Eliminating those jobs saves money, so the shipping companies were
all for the changes.

The Coast Guard eliminated their use of it when the rules changed for the same
reason.

If there ever was a situation where CW might actually be needed, that was
it.


In the recent tsunami disaster, a significant part of the initial radio
communications by amateurs in the disaster area was reportedly done with Morse
Code.

73 de Jim, N2EY




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] RHF Shortwave 0 January 5th 04 02:49 PM
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 03:45 AM
Canada says... "Drop the Code!" Hamguy Swap 1 November 1st 03 10:05 PM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC Brian Policy 3 October 24th 03 12:02 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017