Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Dave VanHorn"
writes: Despite all the "emergency" arguments, even the coast guard dropped it. It's a bit more complex than that. Newer radio systems replaced the need for *radio operators* on ships in the 1990s, and the rules were changed to eliminate the need for maritime CW capability. Eliminating those jobs saves money, so the shipping companies were all for the changes. The Coast Guard eliminated their use of it when the rules changed for the same reason. If there ever was a situation where CW might actually be needed, that was it. In the recent tsunami disaster, a significant part of the initial radio communications by amateurs in the disaster area was reportedly done with Morse Code. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Canada says... "Drop the Code!" | Swap | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |