LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #27   Report Post  
Old February 16th 05, 04:00 PM
jakdedert
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim wrote:

snip
My humble opinion is "It would be better to drop code and up the
technical". There are more than enough amateurs who know little about
radio as it is...


....or electronics in general. The other day there was a 'ham' (posting on
sci.electronics.repair) who was confused as to how much current a 12v p.s.
had to source in order to run his mobile rig at home.

They don't test on Ohm's Law....?!!

jak


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] RHF Shortwave 0 January 5th 04 02:49 PM
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 03:45 AM
Canada says... "Drop the Code!" Hamguy Swap 1 November 1st 03 10:05 PM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC Brian Policy 3 October 24th 03 12:02 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017