Richard Clark wrote:

On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:21:56 -0500, Tom Ring
wrote:


Like you Richard, who vote for a yellow-dog-democrats, I will vote for
anything that has breath that is Libertarian.


Hi Tom,

You want to look at that sentence again and propose just what it
means? You vote, like me, for yellow-dog-democrats? Or you (in
contrast to me) vote for Libertarians who are like
yellow-dog-democrats? Or you (a yellow-dog-democrat) vote for
Libertarians? You seem to be politically ambivalent. ;-)

Punctuation and grammar matters.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard, he's a Libertarian. You have to expect sentences like
that from Libertarians.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH
(P.S. Cecil is a Libertarian, too.)

Tom Donaly wrote:

SNIPPED


Richard, he's a Libertarian. You have to expect sentences like
that from Libertarians.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH
(P.S. Cecil is a Libertarian, too.)

Libertarian = Anarchy rules!
Democratic = Tyranny of the majority rules!
Republican = Strong private sector economy rules!
Socialist = Elitist know what's best for you and me.
Green Party = Nature rules, the hell with people.
Conservationist = Dinosaur's rule.

/s/ DD

Dave wrote:
Libertarian = Anarchy rules!

From: http://www.lp.org/article_85.shtml

What is a Libertarian?

Libertarians believe that you have the right to live your life as you
wish, without the government interfering -- as long as you don’t violate
the rights of others. Politically, this means Libertarians favor rolling
back the size and cost of government, and eliminating laws that stifle
the economy and control people’s personal choices.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote:
Dave wrote:

Libertarian = Anarchy rules!


From: http://www.lp.org/article_85.shtml

What is a Libertarian?

I think the Barney Protocol needs to be reviewed:


Barney Miller is a socialist

Barney Fife is a fascist

***Barney Rubble is a libertarian***



and (this just in)...

Barney Google has joined the Republican Party

Green cheese.

Oops .. wrong forum.

jawod wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

Dave wrote:

Libertarian = Anarchy rules!



From: http://www.lp.org/article_85.shtml

What is a Libertarian?

I think the Barney Protocol needs to be reviewed:


Barney Miller is a socialist

Barney Fife is a fascist

***Barney Rubble is a libertarian***

Doggonit, soda out the nose and a mess to clean up! Good one!



and (this just in)...

Barney Google has joined the Republican Party

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

Mike Coslo wrote:

and (this just in)...

Barney Google has joined the Republican Party


- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

Sorry, not possible! The google.com boys are way left of the Ben and
Jerry crowd.

tom
K0TAR

Dave wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote:

SNIPPED



Richard, he's a Libertarian. You have to expect sentences like
that from Libertarians.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH
(P.S. Cecil is a Libertarian, too.)


Libertarian = Anarchy rules!
Democratic = Tyranny of the majority rules!
Republican = Strong private sector economy rules!
In S. America it is known as Oligarchy
Socialist = Elitist know what's best for you and me.
Green Party = Nature rules, the hell with people.
Conservationist = Dinosaur's rule.

/s/ DD

On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 07:24:41 GMT, "Tom Donaly"
wrote:

Richard, he's a Libertarian. You have to expect sentences like
that from Libertarians.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH
(P.S. Cecil is a Libertarian, too.)

Hi Tom,

I've probably voted for more Libertarians on one ballot than either of
them in their lives. We need more genetic diversity in the political
gene pool. Problem is those parties don't work nearly hard enough to
build a grass-roots. Umm, I should ammend that and say they don't
work at all to do it.

Third parties are invariably so self-centered that they want to start
at the top (notably Lyndon Larouche). Unfortunately, courtesy of W we
now have an example of how that turns out when the most left wing
fascist elements put their man in at the top, and the right wing has
voted in politburo lock-step to advanced the party planks of Leon
Trotsky. All Larouche needs to learn is how to haul down the flag,
and start waving bacon.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:


Hi Tom,

I've probably voted for more Libertarians on one ballot than either of
them in their lives. We need more genetic diversity in the political
gene pool. Problem is those parties don't work nearly hard enough to
build a grass-roots. Umm, I should ammend that and say they don't
work at all to do it.

Based on what you said during the last election, I find it tough to
believe you have ever voted anything but the D line. Unless I am mixing
you up with someone else, you went out and bribed street people to vote
2 years ago.


Third parties are invariably so self-centered that they want to start
at the top (notably Lyndon Larouche). Unfortunately, courtesy of W we
now have an example of how that turns out when the most left wing
fascist elements put their man in at the top, and the right wing has
voted in politburo lock-step to advanced the party planks of Leon
Trotsky. All Larouche needs to learn is how to haul down the flag,
and start waving bacon.


You are correct to a certain extent on the 3rd party candidates, our
home grown idiot, Jesse "The Mind" (his nickname for himself during the
election) Ventura is a prime example. He "started" a 3rd party here,
and dumped it after he got the governorship. He was as bad a governor
as we've had, but since they've all been Democrats, including the
Republicans, that's not surprising.

Both of the major parties are corrupt and don't give a rat's ass what
the electorate wants once the votes are cast. There isn't a gnat's
whisker difference between them when you look at what gets into law. On
the court appointees, on the other hand, I might agree they are different.

I will still vote for anyone but the big 2. Any vote for them is
wasted, any vote for anyone but them will at least show that some of us
want change.

A vote for a Republicrat is a wasted vote. It just keeps the current
crap in place.

tom
K0TAR