Richard Clark wrote:


Hi Tom,

I've probably voted for more Libertarians on one ballot than either of
them in their lives. We need more genetic diversity in the political
gene pool. Problem is those parties don't work nearly hard enough to
build a grass-roots. Umm, I should ammend that and say they don't
work at all to do it.

Based on what you said during the last election, I find it tough to
believe you have ever voted anything but the D line. Unless I am mixing
you up with someone else, you went out and bribed street people to vote
2 years ago.


Third parties are invariably so self-centered that they want to start
at the top (notably Lyndon Larouche). Unfortunately, courtesy of W we
now have an example of how that turns out when the most left wing
fascist elements put their man in at the top, and the right wing has
voted in politburo lock-step to advanced the party planks of Leon
Trotsky. All Larouche needs to learn is how to haul down the flag,
and start waving bacon.


You are correct to a certain extent on the 3rd party candidates, our
home grown idiot, Jesse "The Mind" (his nickname for himself during the
election) Ventura is a prime example. He "started" a 3rd party here,
and dumped it after he got the governorship. He was as bad a governor
as we've had, but since they've all been Democrats, including the
Republicans, that's not surprising.

Both of the major parties are corrupt and don't give a rat's ass what
the electorate wants once the votes are cast. There isn't a gnat's
whisker difference between them when you look at what gets into law. On
the court appointees, on the other hand, I might agree they are different.

I will still vote for anyone but the big 2. Any vote for them is
wasted, any vote for anyone but them will at least show that some of us
want change.

A vote for a Republicrat is a wasted vote. It just keeps the current
crap in place.

tom
K0TAR

Richard Clark wrote:

Hi Fred,

Hmmm, water is heavier than air. How does it manage? Even clouds are
heavier than air. Rain comes from asteroids, comets, and meteors?
Dust is heavier than air, as is smoke that comes from China and lands
here in Seattle.

They all rise from the same mechanism - sunlight. Heat generates
convection currents. Currents raise pollution that traps heat. More
heat generates more convection currents. More currents raise more
pollution.

Arguably "more" is by slight degrees, but as any capitalist knows,
compound interest is where the money (pollution) is, and most
technicians have had experience with Thermal Runaway.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

And here we agree. People that ignore scientific facts are, what's that
word?

tom
K0TAR

On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:51:53 -0500, Tom Ring
wrote:

Based on what you said during the last election, I find it tough to
believe you have ever voted anything but the D line. Unless I am mixing
you up with someone else, you went out and bribed street people to vote
2 years ago.

Tom, Tom, Tom,

Is there some Libertarian weed you've been smoking? You can read tea
leaves (leave aside ballots, because only Diebold machines can report
that) on the basis of what is "said?" I'm afraid you are running a
distant last against votes penned by me for low these 36 years.

As far as street people, no, I listened to them gush on about how they
were going to vote for W. One fellow came up to me and leaned on my
ear for an hour telling me how he was a soldier of fortune for
Milosivic (OK, so I misspelled Ossama) in Bosnia (or Herzogovina or
Toxiana) and fully expected to see W in another term. Then he and the
rest would try to bum change (if that is what you mean by bribe), or a
cigarette, and then left their empties nearby to take a dump in the
alley.

They only differ from Rush Limburger by not being as fat, and they
couldn't afford to shop doctors for prescription dope.

What was supremely ironic is that the state Republican party fought
tooth and nail to evict them from the voting booth. Talk about taking
the poison pill for the sake of political purity, this is like a Jim
Jones kool-aid party to me.

No doubt, two years hence in the next election cycle I will be
remembered as volunteering to hand out cyanide pills at the polling
station. Would you care to be a reference so I can apply early?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:51:53 -0500, Tom Ring
wrote:


Based on what you said during the last election, I find it tough to
believe you have ever voted anything but the D line. Unless I am mixing
you up with someone else, you went out and bribed street people to vote
2 years ago.


Tom, Tom, Tom,

Is there some Libertarian weed you've been smoking? You can read tea
leaves (leave aside ballots, because only Diebold machines can report
that) on the basis of what is "said?" I'm afraid you are running a
distant last against votes penned by me for low these 36 years.

As far as street people, no, I listened to them gush on about how they
were going to vote for W. One fellow came up to me and leaned on my
ear for an hour telling me how he was a soldier of fortune for
Milosivic (OK, so I misspelled Ossama) in Bosnia (or Herzogovina or
Toxiana) and fully expected to see W in another term. Then he and the
rest would try to bum change (if that is what you mean by bribe), or a
cigarette, and then left their empties nearby to take a dump in the
alley.

They only differ from Rush Limburger by not being as fat, and they
couldn't afford to shop doctors for prescription dope.

What was supremely ironic is that the state Republican party fought
tooth and nail to evict them from the voting booth. Talk about taking
the poison pill for the sake of political purity, this is like a Jim
Jones kool-aid party to me.

No doubt, two years hence in the next election cycle I will be
remembered as volunteering to hand out cyanide pills at the polling
station. Would you care to be a reference so I can apply early?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Most of the street people around here are very conservative. I once knew
a homeless fellow who testified at a county supervisors meeting against
doing more for the homeless because it would bring in the riff-raff from
other counties.
The drunken homeless, as opposed to the merely homeless, talk a
conservative line because they think most people are conservative,
and are more likely to give alms to a fellow Republican than to
a traitorous Democrat.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

Cecil Moore wrote:
Dave wrote:

Libertarian = Anarchy rules!


From: http://www.lp.org/article_85.shtml

What is a Libertarian?

I think the Barney Protocol needs to be reviewed:


Barney Miller is a socialist

Barney Fife is a fascist

***Barney Rubble is a libertarian***



and (this just in)...

Barney Google has joined the Republican Party

Green cheese.

Oops .. wrong forum.

We must always remember the #1 rule for POLITICIANS: "In everything you do,
ALWAYS campaign for re-election." A politicians #1 job is to get re-elected!

Trying to contribute to the public good means making political decisions, and
political decisions make political enemies and possible loss of an election.

Therefore, follow the 2nd rule for POLITICIANS: "Say YES to everyone as you
campaign, but vote for nothing that is controversial."

/s/ DD

Tom Ring wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:


Hi Tom,

I've probably voted for more Libertarians on one ballot than either of
them in their lives. We need more genetic diversity in the political
gene pool. Problem is those parties don't work nearly hard enough to
build a grass-roots. Umm, I should ammend that and say they don't
work at all to do it.


Based on what you said during the last election, I find it tough to
believe you have ever voted anything but the D line. Unless I am mixing
you up with someone else, you went out and bribed street people to vote
2 years ago.


Third parties are invariably so self-centered that they want to start
at the top (notably Lyndon Larouche). Unfortunately, courtesy of W we
now have an example of how that turns out when the most left wing
fascist elements put their man in at the top, and the right wing has
voted in politburo lock-step to advanced the party planks of Leon
Trotsky. All Larouche needs to learn is how to haul down the flag,
and start waving bacon.


You are correct to a certain extent on the 3rd party candidates, our
home grown idiot, Jesse "The Mind" (his nickname for himself during the
election) Ventura is a prime example. He "started" a 3rd party here,
and dumped it after he got the governorship. He was as bad a governor
as we've had, but since they've all been Democrats, including the
Republicans, that's not surprising.

Both of the major parties are corrupt and don't give a rat's ass what
the electorate wants once the votes are cast. There isn't a gnat's
whisker difference between them when you look at what gets into law. On
the court appointees, on the other hand, I might agree they are different.

I will still vote for anyone but the big 2. Any vote for them is
wasted, any vote for anyone but them will at least show that some of us
want change.

A vote for a Republicrat is a wasted vote. It just keeps the current
crap in place.

tom
K0TAR

Richard Clark wrote:

Tom, Tom, Tom,

Is there some Libertarian weed you've been smoking? You can read tea
leaves (leave aside ballots, because only Diebold machines can report
that) on the basis of what is "said?" I'm afraid you are running a
distant last against votes penned by me for low these 36 years.

As far as street people, no, I listened to them gush on about how they
were going to vote for W. One fellow came up to me and leaned on my
ear for an hour telling me how he was a soldier of fortune for
Milosivic (OK, so I misspelled Ossama) in Bosnia (or Herzogovina or
Toxiana) and fully expected to see W in another term. Then he and the
rest would try to bum change (if that is what you mean by bribe), or a
cigarette, and then left their empties nearby to take a dump in the
alley.

They only differ from Rush Limburger by not being as fat, and they
couldn't afford to shop doctors for prescription dope.

What was supremely ironic is that the state Republican party fought
tooth and nail to evict them from the voting booth. Talk about taking
the poison pill for the sake of political purity, this is like a Jim
Jones kool-aid party to me.

No doubt, two years hence in the next election cycle I will be
remembered as volunteering to hand out cyanide pills at the polling
station. Would you care to be a reference so I can apply early?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard, Richard, Richard.

Talking points, talking points, talking points.

All you Republicrats have is talking points.

You avoided even responding to anything I said. Typical Republicrat.

And you seem to be stuck on "smoking" things. Do you have a problem
you'd like to talk about?

tom
K0TAR

Tom Ring wrote:
Richard Clark wrote:


Tom, Tom, Tom,


Richard, Richard, Richard.


Tom,-Richard, Tom-Richard, Tom-Richard....


In this imperfect world, one is perhaps foolish to expect perfection. I
don't-you shouldn't.

While we all accuse each other of being Democreeps, or Republi-cant's,
or even perhaps the ultimate pejorative - Liberal, it is perhaps a more
realistic expectation to just settle for competency.

That would be kewl.


- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

Tom Donaly wrote:


The drunken homeless, as opposed to the merely homeless, talk a
conservative line because they think most people are conservative,

I just kind of thought that was how they were, Tom!


- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -