On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:36:18 GMT, " Art Unwin KB9MZ"
wrote:

Eznec cannot deal the way we want with lumped loads

Art,

This is baloney.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard you are so quick to show an example of what Cecil was talking
about.but then it is to be expected.
Talk but no walk
If you had studied engineering instead of getting a degree
in shakespear and shakesperian literature you would have realised that
exposing yourself on center stage not only makes you apear effeminate but
devoid of factual information to cover your own inadequacy,.which clearly
shows now that Roy is not around to hang onto his coattails.
Eznec cannot in anyway create a circuit that can emulate
a lumped load. If one took a look at the underpinnings
of complex circuitry you will immediatly understand that all variables are
interconnected with each other for legitamate equivalency. The Eznec program
only has a following because of its longevity because of its inability to be
proactive in dealing with variables.. For true equivalency everything must
be treated as variable for legitamcy until the number crunching is
finished.and most modern programs have that ability which does not in anyway
demean old antenna programs which are now eclipsed by the new.
Frankly Richard you should have stayed in the navy
where your particular atributes aparently attracted
many that were starved of companionship than being
uniterested in physical facts.

Art KB9MZ XG


"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:36:18 GMT, " Art Unwin KB9MZ"
wrote:

Eznec cannot deal the way we want with lumped loads

Art,

This is baloney.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 21:17:20 GMT, " Art Unwin KB9MZ"
wrote:
Eznec cannot in anyway create a circuit that can emulate
a lumped load.

Art,

This is baloney.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Nothing on that post

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 05:43:07 -0700, Wes Stewart
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:27:15 -0600, 'Doc wrote:
|
|
|Wes,
| Do you really think that it makes ~that~ much
|difference?
| 'Doc

Yes... or no... or maybe, depending on what "it" is and how much
difference "it" does or does not make.
Regards,
Wes

Hi Wes,

The difference in your examination satisfyingly amounts to:
1.) the absence of ego towering over the problem;
1a.) the corresponding lack of sneer review that
reduces the argument to "you won't change my mind";
2.) the presence of clear unequivocal study of the problem;
3.) less than 1dB.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Nothing on that post


"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On 28 Jan 2004 00:45:14 GMT, (Tdonaly) wrote:

Steve wrote,

It's more of a math term than an antenna term. I believe this refers to
the
'method of moments' used to calculate the far field. Take the currents
in
all the little sections of the antenna and sum the contributions of each
for
the total field...like what happens in real life.
Steve N.


Thanks Steve. The way the fellow used it it sounded like a single
quantity the square of which was proportional to the radiation
resistance. People who write articles for journals sometimes
get a bit fanciful in their terminology.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH


Hi Fellows,

I dunno. When I read it, it looked like a reference to graphical
analysis or the projection of a point that represents a mean within a
surface area (which, again, harkens back to the "sinusoidal" current
distribution curve).

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Gee no facts or anything on that one either

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On 31 Jan 2004 19:32:18 GMT, (Tdonaly) wrote:
I have to eschew
Gesundheit

Nothing again just talk no walk

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:36:18 GMT, " Art Unwin KB9MZ"
wrote:

Eznec cannot deal the way we want with lumped loads

Art,

This is baloney.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Hmm again no input or facts


"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 21:17:20 GMT, " Art Unwin KB9MZ"
wrote:
Eznec cannot in anyway create a circuit that can emulate
a lumped load.

Art,

This is baloney.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Hmm no facts except calling the kettle black again
Surely there is a post from him with something!


"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 16:49:39 GMT, " Art Unwin KB9MZ"
wrote:
First the idea given by certain people to model
by breaking up the inductance into small parts
is nothing but crap and suedo scientific hoodwinking.

Art,

As usual you are long on condemnation, and short on facts.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Jimimny this guy is elusive suggests he has something to offer but he has
hidden it well.



"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On 31 Jan 2004 02:18:33 GMT, (Tdonaly) wrote:

This is vintage Moore.

You were expecting chopped liver? Tom, you and Wes and.... know
better.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC