|
Cecil wrote,
Tdonaly wrote: O.k., Cecil, let's suppose you're right. Since there's more current going into a coil than coming out, then the coil must be storing charge, somewhere. Tom, Tom, Tom, we are talking about *net* current. The net current in an unterminated transmission line can be zero while 1/4WL away, it is 100 amps. Are you asserting that transmission lines don't conserve charge? Would you please put your brain in gear? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp That's a pretty incoherent post, Cecil. It's tough to have a good argument with you if you won't take the time to understand what I write. Maybe you're trying to sucker me into another 500 post marathon. Forget it, my doctor says I have to eschew effort. I'll attack your ideas again sometime when something else interesting comes up. Otherwise, I'll just be chewing muh cabbage twice. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Tdonaly wrote:
yes, we do, but you can't get the monkeys to perform unless you rattle their cage. Last time I checked, it was the monkeys who believe that a two wavelength helical antenna doesn't have any phase changes. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Gene Fuller wrote:
I am merely commenting on the highly unscientific handwaving approach taken RRAA's most prolific "scientist". Quoting an accepted expert author is handwaving????????????? Do you also believe that there are no phase changes in a two wavelength long helical antenna? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
On 31 Jan 2004 19:32:18 GMT, (Tdonaly) wrote:
I have to eschew Gesundheit |
Gene wrote,
Cecil, This has become unusually entertaining. You have declared experimentation to be unnecessary, e.g., your Diamond antenna story. You have declared math models to be unnecessary and incorrect on numerous occasions. I have worked with a lot of scientists in my career; some were experimentally biased, some were theoretically biased, and many understood that both approaches were useful. However, I do not believe I have ever encountered a "scientist" who rejected both experimental and mathematical approaches at the same time. 73, Gene W4SZ Gene, people who come up with simple "my easy-to-understand, the-scientists-think- they-know-everything-but-don't" theories usually don't have much use for either mathematics or experimentation. Indeed, why should they? Since the theories they've thought up in their heads already explain everything, mathematics and experimentation are merely redundant. It's the same logic that was used to burn what was left of the library at Alexandria (after the Christians had destroyed most of it, already): everything you need to know is in the Koran, so these books are useless. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Tdonaly wrote:
Cecil wrote, Tdonaly wrote: O.k., Cecil, let's suppose you're right. Since there's more current going into a coil than coming out, then the coil must be storing charge, somewhere. It's tough to have a good argument with you if you won't take the time to understand what I write. At the point in the cycle where the voltage on the capacitor is zero, all of the charge is *stored in the coil*. At the point in the cycle where the current through the coil is zero, all the charge is stored in the capacitor. I assumed you already knew that. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Tdonaly wrote:
Gene, people who come up with simple "my easy-to-understand, the-scientists-think-they-know-everything-but-don't" theories ... More hand-waving ad hominem attacks instead of one iota of scientific evidence that Kraus is wrong? Tom, how many electrical degrees does an electrical 1/2WL helical antenna occupy? Could it be that there is a 180 degree phase shift in the current from end to end? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
The reality is that current is different, Eznec can't model it, ...
Yuri, have you read Wes's article? Using wire segments, he modeled a loading coil in EZNEC. His segmented wire model of a coil shows a current taper through the coil. It's on his web page at: http://www.qsl.net/n7ws You can also download Wes's zipped EZNEC files. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp Sorry! OK, I will be more precise: Eznec can't model current through zero physical size, but certain value inductance inserted in the antenna element. (As W8JI shows on his web page modeling his mobile antenna, "proving" that current is the same :-) If the inductance is modeled as coiled wire with numerous segments and proper physical dimensions, then the current is modeled and reflects the reality. (Tough to do modeling typical loading coils.) How's that? Sorry I got pulled into the simplificity :-) LB Cebik on his web site also has an example of coil modeled using segments and it shows current drop. I hope it warms up, so I can get out, dig the car from the snow and do some experimenting. First experiment will be with 80m Hustler coil in order to use "standard" (lousy) typical coil. I will paste LCD strip thermometers on the coil to measure temperature changes at various positions, ends, middle. Experiment #1: I will drive DC current through the coil in order to generate heat and observe the temperatures across the coil. I predict that thermometers will be tracking each other very closely or be identical (ideal case). Experiment #2: I will insert the same coil in the Hustler mobile antenna, tune to resonance and fire 100W to it. I will observe temperatures between the end and center and between two ends. I expect difference indicating difference in current at various points. This will be the least disturbing measurement setup, no conductive nothing disturbing the coil or antenna. I am assuming LCD thermometer is RF transparent and I will verify that it does not detune the antenna/coil. Perhaps not very accurate, but sufficient to demonstrate the debated differences. The next measurements will be with current probes and RF ammeters. This will give more accurate values. Any problems with that? Yuri, K3BU.us |
Cecil
Did you find something wrong with my suggestion above? I might also add that when considering coupling to a inductance the multiple placement of inductors does not help a bit since the coupling distance has no real reference points even tho one may decide the radiating member is the same diameter of the coil. This is why I suggested the new aproach. I would be very interested in any errors that you may spot in any part of the above where a dimensionless inductance is changed to one with actual dimensions. Regards Art "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Cecil Moore wrote: I just looked at the paper again and I don't see any files to download. Where are the files? I only have DOS-based EZNEC. Will it still work? Sorry Wes, the combination of a small screen, color-blindness, and cataracts causes me to miss a lot of things. I have successfully downloaded your zip files now. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com