Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
... Cecil: I feel like a damn idiot, this guy has been at this for sometime (this is from 2004), bet Richard has been having a laugh, look at the following: Richard Harrison wrote: Richard Clark wrote: "This paradox (differing light intensities in various directions) was solved by?" I have not seen that question before, but will speculate that Edwin Hubble deserves the credit as he used "red shift" in the light from other galaxies to show that they are speeding away from us and our galaxy. In fact, they are accelerating so that the farther the galaxy is away from us, the faster it is moving away. From continuous acceleration, the distant galaxy will eventually reach the speed of light. Then, light from the distsnt galaxy won`t reach us because it will tag along with the fast moving galaxy. There may be a time shortage too as Einstein has shown time slows as a thing moves faster. Hubble has also shown that the Doppler effect would shift the frequency lower as velocity of the retreating thing increases. Shift the frequency low enough and the wave is no longer described as light but may be classified as a millimeter radio wave. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI To be accererating, there would have to be a force . Where would this force be coming from and what pray tell is directing it? The speed of light is a constant in all reference frames. If a light source were to be moving at the speed of light away from an observer, an impossiblity in itself, the light would still be moving at c towards the observer. -- Jim Pennino Remove -spam-sux to reply. Regards, JS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|