John Smith I wrote:
art wrote:
How does the Coreolis force differ from radiation "curl" and how does
a tv set made in the northern hemasphere compare in Australia
(southern hemisphere) with an Australian TV set ?


In the NORTHERN HEMISPHERE...
The LAND moves COUNTERCLOCKWISE around the North Pole.
Air flows COUNTERCLOCKWISE around a LOW pressure zone.
Air flows CLOCKWISE around a HIGH pressure zone.

In the SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE...
The LAND moves CLOCKWISE around the South Pole.
Air flows CLOCKWISE around a LOW pressure zone.
Air flows COUNTERCLOCKWISE around a HIGH pressure zone.

... similar effects are also noted in magnetic phenomenon and
objects/properties affected by magnetic properties.

I know of no complete studies which have reached any conclusive ends in
the directions you seem to suggest. Most likely, not enough is known yet.

This has been understood by the educated world since about 1778 when
Laplace published his tidal equations, or 1835 when Gaspard-Gustave Coriolis
published.

Your education seems to be a bit behind the times.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

wrote:
John Smith I wrote:
art wrote:
How does the Coreolis force differ from radiation "curl" and how does
a tv set made in the northern hemasphere compare in Australia
(southern hemisphere) with an Australian TV set ?


In the NORTHERN HEMISPHERE...
The LAND moves COUNTERCLOCKWISE around the North Pole.
Air flows COUNTERCLOCKWISE around a LOW pressure zone.
Air flows CLOCKWISE around a HIGH pressure zone.

In the SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE...
The LAND moves CLOCKWISE around the South Pole.
Air flows CLOCKWISE around a LOW pressure zone.
Air flows COUNTERCLOCKWISE around a HIGH pressure zone.

... similar effects are also noted in magnetic phenomenon and
objects/properties affected by magnetic properties.

I know of no complete studies which have reached any conclusive ends in
the directions you seem to suggest. Most likely, not enough is known yet.

This has been understood by the educated world since about 1778 when
Laplace published his tidal equations, or 1835 when Gaspard-Gustave Coriolis
published.

Your education seems to be a bit behind the times.


It is quite obvious the "Coriolis Effect" has NOTHING to do with water
taking its' whirlpool course down the drain in regards to its' current
hemisphere ... but you grow predictable. I figured you would lack the
intelligence to see this obvious fact.

You probably would amuse a high school physics lab to no end, ever try
dressing up in a clowns suit and visiting one?

JS

John Smith I wrote:
wrote:
John Smith I wrote:
art wrote:
How does the Coreolis force differ from radiation "curl" and how does
a tv set made in the northern hemasphere compare in Australia
(southern hemisphere) with an Australian TV set ?


In the NORTHERN HEMISPHERE...
The LAND moves COUNTERCLOCKWISE around the North Pole.
Air flows COUNTERCLOCKWISE around a LOW pressure zone.
Air flows CLOCKWISE around a HIGH pressure zone.

In the SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE...
The LAND moves CLOCKWISE around the South Pole.
Air flows CLOCKWISE around a LOW pressure zone.
Air flows COUNTERCLOCKWISE around a HIGH pressure zone.

... similar effects are also noted in magnetic phenomenon and
objects/properties affected by magnetic properties.

I know of no complete studies which have reached any conclusive ends in
the directions you seem to suggest. Most likely, not enough is known yet.

This has been understood by the educated world since about 1778 when
Laplace published his tidal equations, or 1835 when Gaspard-Gustave Coriolis
published.

Your education seems to be a bit behind the times.


It is quite obvious the "Coriolis Effect" has NOTHING to do with water
taking its' whirlpool course down the drain in regards to its' current
hemisphere ... but you grow predictable. I figured you would lack the
intelligence to see this obvious fact.

Babbling fool, the above was about AIR, not water.

Do you know the difference between air and water?

snip remaining babble

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

wrote:

...
Babbling fool, the above was about AIR, not water.

Do you know the difference between air and water?

snip remaining babble


Is it possible you will ever come to know the difference between your
A$$ and a hole in the ground?

Or, even the hole in your head--for that matter ...

JS

wrote:
John Smith I wrote:
wrote:
John Smith I wrote:
art wrote:
How does the Coreolis force differ from radiation "curl" and how does
a tv set made in the northern hemasphere compare in Australia
(southern hemisphere) with an Australian TV set ?

In the NORTHERN HEMISPHERE...
The LAND moves COUNTERCLOCKWISE around the North Pole.
Air flows COUNTERCLOCKWISE around a LOW pressure zone.
Air flows CLOCKWISE around a HIGH pressure zone.
In the SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE...
The LAND moves CLOCKWISE around the South Pole.
Air flows CLOCKWISE around a LOW pressure zone.
Air flows COUNTERCLOCKWISE around a HIGH pressure zone.
... similar effects are also noted in magnetic phenomenon and
objects/properties affected by magnetic properties.
I know of no complete studies which have reached any conclusive ends in
the directions you seem to suggest. Most likely, not enough is known yet.
This has been understood by the educated world since about 1778 when
Laplace published his tidal equations, or 1835 when Gaspard-Gustave Coriolis
published.

Your education seems to be a bit behind the times.


It is quite obvious the "Coriolis Effect" has NOTHING to do with water
taking its' whirlpool course down the drain in regards to its' current
hemisphere ... but you grow predictable. I figured you would lack the
intelligence to see this obvious fact.

Babbling fool, the above was about AIR, not water.

Do you know the difference between air and water?


In order to observe the Coriolis effect in draining water, several
extraordinary precautions must be taken. You must have a smooth circular
pan with a precisely centered and very small hole in the center. The pan
is filled with water, and allowed to sit for enough time that all motion
of the water is gone at the onset of the experiment. My source suggests
a week. Then the stopper must be removed from below in a manner that
doesn't disturb the water. (save the obvious) If the flow is small
enough, and no other disturbances occur, after about an hour, a cyclonic
rotation occurs.

For all practical purposes, the effect is only applicable for large and
long lasting fluid motion.

Too bad that, it would be fun to watch water refuse to swirl at all if
we emptied a sink at the equator. 8^)

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

"art" wrote in message
ps.com...
How does the Coreolis force differ from radiation "curl" and how does
a tv set made in the northern hemasphere compare in Australia
(southern hemisphere) with an Australian TV set ?


radiation doesn't curl, fields do, and coreolis force is ficticious, you can
counteract it by placing your canoe paddles at right angles to the direction
of motion as you circle a whirlpool in your boat. as for tv's, everyone
knows that you have to reverse the magnitization on tv's when you cross the
equator, if you don't all the colors come out wrong and the pictures are all
upside down.

"Dave" wrote in news:zEpCh.5004$lo1.4362@trndny05:

for tv's, everyone knows that you have to reverse the magnitization on
tv's when you cross the equator, if you don't all the colors come out
wrong and the pictures are all upside down.

You can't rick Art like that, he will be well aware that we in the southern
hemisphere are upside down relative to you guys, so compensating for the
effect you describe.

Owen

On 19 Feb, 15:21, Owen Duffy wrote:
"Dave" wrote innews:zEpCh.5004$lo1.4362@trndny05:

for tv's, everyone knows that you have to reverse the magnitization on
tv's when you cross the equator, if you don't all the colors come out
wrong and the pictures are all upside down.

You can't rick Art like that, he will be well aware that we in the southern
hemisphere are upside down relative to you guys, so compensating for the
effect you describe.

Owen

Quit it Owen, I'm sitting in the stands watching the play go
backwards and forwards and giggling all the time. It is like asking
the capital of Kentucky, is it louavle or Louyvill and the longer it
goes on the funnier it will be so please stay quiet
Thanks