Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote in
: On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:35:51 GMT, "David Hooker" wrote: Hi David, Presumably, you are speaking of a pocket-sized, keyring-attached receiving antenna too, such that it can resolve the point of transmission to a fairly narrow region. It would take an especially large pocket to accomplish (not even a 'roo's). Such a design demands complexity in the form of volume at the scale of 2 meters. You are off by a scale of 100 or so. Perhaps if your frequency was set to 15GHz.... Why not, due to the close range, think inverse square law instead of directivity? Could still be a bit confusing in an underground carpark, but basically, the source and the receiver are close enough that a few steps ought to make a readable difference in strength. Just walk in a circle and keep widening it on the side where the signal is strongest and narrowing where it is weakest. The closer you get, the less sensitivity you need, so have some method of turning that down. And 100mw is LOTS of power for this! -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 1800667 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Directional antenna - recomendation | Dx | |||
Directional antenna - recomendation | Dx | |||
Antenna directional | Swap | |||
Directional antenna | Antenna | |||
Directional antenna wanted. | Antenna |