Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark, KB7QHC wrote:
"Having a reference is always the point to start from." Kraus compares his W8JK array with its two dipoles spaced only 1/8-wavelength apart, against an array with its two dipoles spaced 1/2-wavelength, one dipole above the other. These two arrays are both pictured on page 184 of the 3rd edition of Kraus` "Antennas". Though the gain of either array is about 6 dB, the inherent impedance of the W8JK array is low due to its close spacing and coupling. Impedance of the 1/2-wave-spaced array is 333 ohms at its drivepoint. Impedance of the W8JK is adjusted with a stub to match the feedline. Its inherent low impedance may cost the W8JK about a fraction of a dB in efficiency (see page 187) but as both dipoles are high (sharing the same horizontal plane) a lowered angle of maximum radiation has proved advantageous for the W8JK. Kraus` comparison seems fair and his disclosure seems complete. Maybe that`s why the the antenna array known by his amateur radio call sign is famous. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mininec antenna computor programs and Gaussian arrays | Antenna | |||
Gaussian antenna aunwin | Antenna | |||
RCA Multiple Antenna Array from the World Trade Center | Shortwave | |||
A gaussian style radiating antenna | Antenna | |||
Phased array antenna patterns | Antenna |