LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #25   Report Post  
Old May 11th 07, 12:06 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 40
Default Electron ratio to form a radiation field

Sorry people if I step in, but I really don't understand a word of
this thread.
(I'm a telecomunnication engineer though).

On 11 Mag, 04:15, art wrote:

Heh I am agreeing with you, 377 ohms is a ratio pure and simple.
I am now a member of the majority. I used to call 377 ohms an
impedance
but I am now am agreement with the majority, 377 ohms is a ratio.
If Maxwell is part of the majority how can I go wrong. Seems like the
blitz
got in the way of that jewel being passed on.
Art


R=V/I (ohm's law) is a ratio and its dimensional result is ohms.
What's wrong with Zo beeing dimensionally in ohms and beeing a ratio?

Thanks and 73
Francesco IZ8DWF





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: @$10NOS LEWIS & KAUFMAN, Ltd. LOS GATOS 254 ELECTRON TUBERARE wa2rqy Boatanchors 0 December 12th 06 04:10 PM
WTB: Tube, electron = 6DR7 AL G. Swap 0 February 25th 06 09:01 PM
FA: EIMAC 3-500Z ELECTRON TUBE AND HR-6 PLATE CAP [email protected] Swap 0 June 15th 05 05:28 AM
Lennie's Back In Form...Old Rant's...Same Form... K4YZ Policy 18 May 12th 05 11:59 PM
inducors/form factors/radiation revisited Art Unwin KB9MZ Antenna 18 January 11th 04 05:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017