Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry people if I step in, but I really don't understand a word of
this thread. (I'm a telecomunnication engineer though). On 11 Mag, 04:15, art wrote: Heh I am agreeing with you, 377 ohms is a ratio pure and simple. I am now a member of the majority. I used to call 377 ohms an impedance but I am now am agreement with the majority, 377 ohms is a ratio. If Maxwell is part of the majority how can I go wrong. Seems like the blitz got in the way of that jewel being passed on. Art R=V/I (ohm's law) is a ratio and its dimensional result is ohms. What's wrong with Zo beeing dimensionally in ohms and beeing a ratio? Thanks and 73 Francesco IZ8DWF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: @$10NOS LEWIS & KAUFMAN, Ltd. LOS GATOS 254 ELECTRON TUBERARE | Boatanchors | |||
WTB: Tube, electron = 6DR7 | Swap | |||
FA: EIMAC 3-500Z ELECTRON TUBE AND HR-6 PLATE CAP | Swap | |||
Lennie's Back In Form...Old Rant's...Same Form... | Policy | |||
inducors/form factors/radiation revisited | Antenna |