Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:08:09 -0700, art wrote:
watch the debate on Eham that is held in gentlemany fashion and with a proponent of knoweledge to which you aspire to and have failed miserably7 Hi Arthur, Who cluod be oeffnded when they can't ustnanderd you for all the mipellssings7 Tom is only one of many Yes he is. Please excuse my absence from this thread for a short while while I am away enjoying a debate regarding ham radio with an expert in a areana of experts. Odd you leave that sandbox and keep coming back here, isn't it? ;-) When you do, enjoy my new thread "20 Questions - Redux." (That is WHY you keep returning n'est pas?) 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Take apart Ranger VFO drive mechanism? | Boatanchors | |||
New PC-based receiver at Universal Radio | Shortwave | |||
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
Spin, LARDASS, Spin | General | |||
We Need a BANDWIDTH-BASED Frequency Plan - NOT Mode-Based. | Policy |