art hath wroth:

You might want to learn to use a text editor to remove most of the
quoted text. I can't stand to read my own writings more than once.

I believe that the standard example of radiation referred to above
is in error.

That's fine. Kindly supply a replacement for Maxwell's Equations and
I'll entertain the possibility of error. I'm sure there's a Nobel
Price awaiting you for the effort.

I do not believe that radiation consists of fields of any sort
but consists of ejected static particles in form of a swarm.

I believe the corpuscle theory of light and radiation went down in
flames about 180 years ago. Incidentally, "static" means not moving,
which precludes anything that is ejected or swarms. Try dynamic
instead.

I have asked the Eham forum to wade in on that one since it
appears they have more scientifically molecular inclined members.

My molecules are just as scientific as any ham radio operator. Are
you suggesting that my molecules are in any way inferior?

The only cycle that repeates in radiation is the tank circuit of a
diagmagnetic material which is resonant i.e. equal capacitance and
inductance.

A resonant circuit is characterized by equal capacitive reactance and
inductive reactance, not equal capacitance and inductance.

Diamagnetic material is great for demonstrating magnetic levitation,
but rather useless for anything in a cheap WWVB receiver.
Incidentally, all materials have diamagnetic properties to some
degree.

Seems like the posts are relying on propagating fields
which to me is an error.

Well, the WWVB transmitters are in Colorado. I'm in California. The
signals did not arrive via bus, truck, airplane, train, or carrier
pigeon. Lacking any other obvious transportation methods, I suspect
they arrived by electromagnetic propagation.

--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558